Ancient Democratic Senator Confirms How To Monkey-Wrench An Administrative Amnesty
November 18, 2014, 10:47 AM
A+
|
a-
Print Friendly and PDF
Creaky old Senator Carl Levin [D-MI], who turned 80 this year and is voluntarily retiring after 36 years in the World's Greatest Deliberative Body, acknowledged some basic facts about the legislative process to National Review's Joel Gehrke on Thursday, November 13.

(By the way, Carl Levin's even creakier brother Sander was just re-elected to a 17th term in the House of Representatives.  I expect Mark Steyn would view the nearly-perpetual-legislator Levin brothers as prime specimens of what Steyn calls "this country's depraved political class.")

Gehrke wrote up the interview Monday with the title Top Democrat: GOP Can Withhold Funding For Obama’s Amnesty Orders.  There's nothing really startling about this — I doubt if it was news to Gehrke — except for the senator's candidness.

In Gehrke's and Levin's words, here's the gist:

A top Senate Democrat lent credibility to conservative efforts to block President Obama’s pending administrative amnesty, explaining that Congress has the authority to withhold funding for presidential initiatives.

“It happens all the time,” retiring Senator Carl Levin (D., Mich.) told National Review Online while walking through the Capitol Thursday evening.

Levin emphasized the distinction between shutting down the government, as happened last year, and refusing to appropriate money for something.

“That’s not uncommon that there’s amendments saying ‘none of the funds in this appropriation bill may be spent for’ — fill in the blank,” Levin said.

So if you're going to be phoning and faxing the offices of Republican House members in coming days to urge that they Do Something! that will monkey-wrench the alien-in-chief's planned executive amnesty, make sure to remind them about this basic legislative strategy.

So the sensible suggestions to make in such calls and faxes are:

1. Fund the national government, via a continuing resolution [CR], only until mid-January.  (Nothing but a "clean" CR, without such defunding, will get through the lame-duck Senate, still under Harry Reid's death grip.)

2. Then, in January, pass legislation that funds the government while specifically denying money to any agencies that would implement the mass amnesty.  i.e. Furlough workers at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services until further notice!

Republican geldings then needn't fear that they'll be scapegoated for — The Horror — a "government shutdown."

This is essentially the strategy that Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies recently outlined ...

[I]n the next Congress, the House could pull out the Homeland Security budget (rather than fold it into an omnibus funding bill for the whole government) and attach the rider just to that, so when Obama vetoes it, only DHS will be subject to a “shutdown.” The reason for the quotation marks is that it won’t be much of a shutdown since law-enforcement components continue to function as “essential personnel,” including the Border Patrol, the Secret Service, the Coast Guard, ICE, and the TSA. In fact, the chief component of DHS that actually would be idled by a budget battle would be US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the very bureau that would have to implement Obama’s lawless amnesty.

This creates a Catch 22 for Obama, if only the GOP has the wit to exploit it — if he signs a DHS budget with the rider prohibiting his amnesty, then it doesn’t happen (though he would still be able to implement certain other parts of his lawless plan). But if he vetoes it, the agency that he needs to process the amnesty is furloughed, so the amnesty still doesn’t happen.

[A Vote for a Long-Term Budget Is a Vote for Amnesty, National Review Online, November 13, 2014]

... but now it's been endorsed by Democratic pooh-bah Carl Levin!