As Brown may or may not have said seconds before his death: I give up.
If the Ferguson police are forced to hire more minorities and women for the sake of diversity, the one thing we can be sure of is that more black people will be murdered, raped and assaulted.
Someone's got to say it, so it might as well be me: I'm against more black people being murdered, raped and assaulted.
In a massive, detailed 2000 study of the effect of court-ordered affirmative action plans on police departments, economist John Lott found that the more minorities on a police force, the higher the rates of murder, manslaughter, violent crime, robbery and aggravated assault will be. Violent crime increased by a minimum of 3.3 percent every year after affirmative action policies went into effect—and the spike in crime was highest in black neighborhoods.[Does a Helping Hand Put Others At Risk?: Affirmative Action, Police Departments, and Crime, Economic Inquiry, April 2000]
The problem was not with black cops, Lott's study showed, but rather with the lowering of standards across the board, resulting in less-qualified officers of every race. To get more of MSNBC's "voices of oppression" on police forces, requirements are reduced for all recruits. (Just as quality declined at MSNBC when "voices of oppression" had to be added to their lineup.)
About a decade into a federal consent decree requiring the Los Angeles Police Department to hire more minority officers, the LAPD'S Rampart division was employing gang members in uniforms.
Training officer Jim Peasha told investigative reporter Jan Golab that he left his unit because of the preposterous recruits being sent to him as a result of affirmative action. "I had some fantastic minority recruits," Peasha said. "One black kid was the best I ever had." But he also had "one guy who I knew was on drugs and I couldn't get him out. He wound up getting caught working as a guard at a rock (cocaine) house. An off-duty cop!" [How Racial P.C. Corrupted the LAPD , American Enterprise, June 2005]
It was almost as if the LAPD was turning into the public school system.
By the time of the Rampart scandal, two dozen black police officers in Los Angeles were suspected of gang activity. Most were forced out. Four officers were proved to have been engaging in criminal acts—including a bank robbery and an attempted murder. All were black and Hispanic. (Let's call them "officers of oppression.")
As a top official with the LAPD told Golab, "This is not an LAPD problem; this is a black problem."
It was so obvious that affirmative action had led to the Rampart scandal that a "Blue Ribbon" commission specifically denied it. Twice. Using the exact same words. It was the equivalent of calling a press conference to announce that you're not gay.
This is the irrelevancy printed twice in the commission's report:
"Personnel Department experts found no instance where a candidate failed to meet the LAPD's background or psychological standards. Moreover, the experts found no meaningful difference in the application of background and psychological standards to candidates of varying race or ethnicity."[Rampart Reconsidered, PDF]Wait—no applicants failed? That's precisely the point! Everyone gets an "A," every applicant becomes a police officer.
And no one imagined that only the minority officers would be less qualified. As Lott's study showed, once standards are lowered to ensure "diversity," standards are lowered for all recruits, resulting in a rainbow coalition of incompetence.
This is exactly how Democrats wrecked the economy with the subprime mortgage crisis. Then-Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Andrew Cuomo, Sen. Chris Dodd and Rep. Barney Frank bragged about how they were helping minorities get mortgages by forcing banks to adopt ridiculously low lending standards.
But once traditional measures of credit-worthiness were jettisoned, they were jettisoned for everyone. You will notice that the housing market crash was concentrated not in black neighborhoods, but in house-flipping hot spots.
Lott's study did find some preliminary evidence that increasing the number of black male cops on a police force led to a slight reduction in shootings of civilians—as did having more white male cops. But more white females on a police force increased shootings of civilians. The voices of oppression don't get to have it both ways.
The main benefit to having black cops shooting civilians is that Al Sharpton gets less air time, which I think we're all in favor of. Also, when a black cop shoots a civilian, the whole world doesn't have to stop, as the media go on a bloodhound-search for racism.
(Diallo didn't obey the officers because he didn't speak English. Police work is going to be so exciting in Marco Rubio's America. "Freeze! Para continuar en Espanol, marque el dos.")
Just a few months later, a cop in Chicago shot an unarmed civilian, LaTanya Haggerty, a 26-year-old computer programmer, who was sitting in the passenger seat of a car. The officer thought LaTanya had a gun—but that turned out to be a cellphone.
There was no Bruce Springsteen song about LaTanya, no preening by Sen. Bill Bradley on the Senate floor, no 24/7 coverage. The FBI, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and the Justice Department didn't open investigations into LaTanya's shooting.
You've probably never even heard of LaTanya Haggerty—because the officer who shot her was black.
The Diallo cops were prosecuted for murder (and acquitted). The officer in Chicago lost her job. LaTanya Haggerty's shooting is so little known that in 2008, the Chicago Sun-Times misidentified her as the officer, not the victim, in the shooting.
The only real advantage to compelling the Ferguson police force to adopt affirmative action hiring policies is that the media will be tickled pink with themselves for striking a blow against "racism." On the other hand, more black people will be murdered, raped and maimed as crime rates rise. I guess it's really just a matter of priorities.
Her most recent book is Never Trust a Liberal Over Three-Especially a Republican.