NOTE: PLEASE say if you DON'T want your name and/or
email address published when sending VDARE email.
A Reader Has Ideas On Deporting Illegals, Even If
Bush Has None
A Hostile Reader Gloats About The Senate
Sellout; Sailer And Fulford Reply
From: A Turkish Reader
I've just read an idiotic reader
throw that inane "go back to Yurp" line to the
VDARE staff. Here are four arguments you can make to
counter this stupid, stupid, slogan.
- If communal territory was all
that was needed for a country, we end up with the
absurd idea that, for instance, the Kung Bushmen—a
primitive hunter/gatherer tribe in Africa that
live in the Kalahari—constitute a "country."
America is not just "sand."
It is everything that the "Yurpeens" have built
there. If that fellow is so disgusted by everything
European, he should—by implication—be ready to waive any
and every entitlement, no matter how minute, to
utilizing, or holding in possession or as property, all
the amenities that ensue from that European
civilization. That means, he, the disgusted patriotic
Indian that he is, will not be using even a public
toilet, let alone the roads, hospitals, schools,
commercial enterprises, etc.
In other words, we expect him to be
consistent in his words and deeds, and go build a tent
in the middle of the
Mojave desert with his community, and live there
without receiving any help from the evil Europeans.
- Indian is a funny moniker. It
is absurd to claim that because these people are
"natives" of this or that region in the
continental piece of land stretching from the
Bering Strait down to Patagonia, they are
entitled to every acre, every yard of it. What
nonsense. Since when is a descendent of the Maya,
for instance, entitled to a piece of land that used
to be the hunting grounds of, say, the Sioux? These
tribes had no notion of "private" property as
understood by the evil Europeans, and if a Mayan had
the temerity to enter the "territory" of the
"Apache," they'd do the "diversitarian"
act of tying him to a pole, skinning his head as
they tortured him with arrows and knives, and then
burnt him alive. If that fellow feels
"entitled" to any piece of America simply
because he has the facial features of a Mayan or an
Aztec, and—paradoxically—the name and surname of a
Catholic European, he should settle the
"property" score with the "native" tribes
of North America first.
- Finally, since when is a piece
of land yours simply because you happen to wander
parts of it now and then? I walk the streets of
Istanbul, but I don't suffer from the delusion
that I own them. A wolf that lives in a forest does
not "own" the forest. You see, "private
ownership" is a norm observed by only
"civilized" peoples, like the Europeans, and
savage "Indians" have not been
recorded to observe it. And that norm tells us that
if a piece of property is legally owned by Joe or
Peter now, no outsider can just walk in and claim it
as his simply because his ancestors used to live in
the ten thousand-mile vicinity.
- There is one more, typically
"leftie" inconsistency in his tone: he speaks
with the mindset of a thug: "we're more crowded
than you, so we'll beat the hell out of you."
Well, if he considers use of force as a legitimate
means to take over property, then what the hell is
his issue with
evil Europeans taking over land that was
reader has written previous letters to VDARE.com