Earlier: JOHN DERBYSHIRE: I Will Not Genuflect To This Church Of Antiracism

There was a preponderance of white women at the Bethesda gathering I wrote about  above, where GoodWhites worshipped at the new  "Church Of Antiracism"

Can't load tweet https://twitter.com/arianedatil/status/1267880398962544645?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1267880398962544645%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wusa9.com%2Farticle%2Fnews%2Fmaryland-bethesda-protests-george-floyd%2F65-45ba836d-e034-47a7-9b5d-13e6930d6760: Unknown MIME type: text/html

White women have been much in evidence at all the protests, and it calls for some kind of explanation.

I should probably say single white women. As Steve Sailer has noted, and as Ed West covers in his new book Small Men on the Wrong Side of History: How To Be A Modern Conservative, which I recommend to your attention, quote from Ed:

The marriage rate among white women remains one of the most reliable variables for predicting the Republican Party's support in any state.

All right, so, single white women: What are they doing, filling the pews at the Church of Antiracism—whose gospel is, let's be blunt about it, anti-white?

I don't know the answer, but whenever this comes up on a Dissident Right human-sciences thread, there's always someone arguing that it's a matter of evolutionary psychology. He argues—and yes, of course it's always a he—that white women are dissatisfied with the weakness of white men, and keen to submit to some more forceful conqueror.

So is the anti-whiteness of single white women the fault of white men somehow? I don't see why it shouldn't be; everything else is.