But completely missing from public debate, as usual: the fact that that all job growth was all taken by immigrants—and the immigrant workforce population continues the incredible growth it suddenly began last month (perhaps accounting for the weak wage growth). What’s going on?
The “other” employment survey, of households rather than businesses, finds even stronger job growth—a remarkable 510,000 new positions created for the month. But the Household Survey also tracks nativity, and for the second month running this shows a continuing spike in the foreign-born working age population (including illegals):
In February 2018 there were 1.818 million more working-age immigrants than in February 2017. This comes on the heels of a 1.246 million increase, year-over-year, recorded in January. By contrast, the last five months of 2017 saw year-over-year declines from the same month in 2016—part of what we optimistically saw as a "Trump Effect."
These are net figures. Over a 12-month period an average of perhaps 300,000 immigrants die and an equal number leave the U.S. voluntarily. So the 1.818 million net rise in foreign-born population since last February means that about 2.4 million foreign-born individuals may have entered the country over the past 12 months. (This excludes tourists and other short-term entrants.)
In percentage terms, the immigrant working-age population grew 11-times faster than the corresponding native-born American population in February – 4.42% versus 0.41%. If 4.42% per annum growth becomes the norm, the number of immigrants working here will double in about 16 years.
The monthly job numbers also show native-born Americans being displaced by their foreign-born competitors. In February:
In normal times this might be a big story. But the even the conservative, non-Main Stream Media is too steeped in economic euphoria to notice.
The recent spike in American worker displacement is placed in a longer historical context in VDARE.com’s New American Worker Displacement Index (NVDAWDI):
Trump has not yet come close to repairing the damage done by eight years of Obama. Native-born American workers lost ground to their foreign-born competitors throughout the Obama years, and, shown above, this trend accelerated significantly in the months leading up to the election.
Another way of looking at American worker displacement: the immigrant share of total U.S. employment:
The immigrant share rose steadily, albeit erratically, throughout the Obama years. It fell sharply in the months after the 2016 election, roared back to Obama-era levels in the spring, and drifted downward in the last months of 2017.
Then it rebounded. In February the immigrant share of U.S. employment was 17.55%—larger than any month for which we have data. (The series starts in January 2008.)
A detailed snapshot of American worker displacement over the past year is available in the Employment Status of the Civilian Population by Nativity table published in the monthly BLS Report.
|Employment Status by Nativity, Feb.2017- Feb.2018|
|(numbers in 1000s; not seasonally adjusted)|
|Foreign born, 16 years and older|
|Civilian labor force||27,049||28,218||1,169||4.32%|
|Participation rate (%)||65.8||65.7||-0.1 pts.||-0.15%|
|Employment/population %||62.5||63.1||0.6 pts.||0.96%|
|Unemployment rate (%)||5.0||4.0||-1.0 pts.||-20.00%|
|Not in labor force||14,088||14,736||648||4.60%|
|Native born, 16 years and older|
|Civilian labor force||132,432||133,276||844||0.64%|
|Participation rate (%)||62.1||62.3||0.2 pts.||0.32%|
|Employment/population %||59.1||59.5||0.4 pts.||0.68%|
|Unemployment rate (%)||4.9||4.5||-0.4 pts.||-8.16%|
|Not in labor force||80,676||80,703||27||0.03%|
|Source: BLS, The Employment Situation-February 2018, Table A-7, March 9, 2018.|
We have always been concerned about the problem of statistical noise. This was particularly true for the January 2018 surge in the foreign-born working age population, which was at least in part triggered by the statistical “adjustments” incorporated into the Household Survey at the beginning of the year. And it’s why we like to look at longer-term trends—and the trend late last year was very strong. We speculated that that this “Trump Effect” would reassert itself after January, as it did after the similar inexplicable reversal last spring. We were wrong.
At least so far. We still don’t rule out the possibility that the “Trump Effect” will reassert itself, and that American Worker Displacement and the immigrant workforce will again both begin to shrink.
But fourteen months into the Trump Presidency, it seems clear that improved enforcement, at least on the current scale, is not enough—America needs a legislated immigration moratorium.
And, of course, a border wall.