Britain's Immivasion Disaster: Was Tony Blair Bribed Before Merkel?
June 04, 2017, 04:13 PM
A+
|
a-
Print Friendly and PDF
H/T Pic InformationLiberation

H/T  Ann Coulter’s increasingly valuable Twitter feed  for alerting me to  Conman Blair's cynical conspiracy to deceive the British people and let in 2million migrants against the rules: Explosive new biography lays ex-PM's betrayal bare By JAMES SLACK The Daily Mail 27 February,2016

Tony Blair presided over a silent conspiracy to change the face of Britain for ever with mass immigration, an explosive book reveals.

He ordered his Labour government never to discuss in public the supposed ‘advantages’ of the unprecedented influx.

But behind the scenes ministers were instructed to wave tens of thousands of asylum seekers into the UK under cover of their being ‘economic migrants’.

The book, Broken Vows: Tony Blair – The Tragedy of Power by Tom Bower names names
Barbara Roche…was immigration minister between 1999 and 2001. During this period, she quietly adopted policies – with Mr Blair’s approval – that changed the face of the UK.

Upon her appointment, she told a senior immigration official: ‘Asylum seekers should be allowed to stay in Britain. Removal takes too long and it’s emotional.’

Of Jack Straw, the Home Secretary, the book says
In public, he was keen to show he wasn’t an easy touch. There should be stronger controls at the borders, he told the Commons.

Yet behind the scenes, he continued to make it easier for asylum seekers. And harder for officials.

What was going on here? With Jack Straw and Barbara Roche, the answer is obvious. Both were of Jewish extraction. They were acting on the extraordinary lust so many Jews show the world over to swamp the society which hosts them with as large  and as alien an influx of immigrants as possible. Kevin MacDonald has carefully analyzed this for us in Is Immigration Really A “Jewish Value”? and more recently this year in Why Do Jewish Organizations Want Anti-Israel Refugees? Speechwriter and immigration fanatic Andrew Neather directly asserted in 2009 that the Blair Government’s motive was ideological.

But Blair is more of a puzzle. Of Scottish descent, the efforts of his upwardly mobile father supplied him with an elite education and his brother is a Judge. There no obvious reason why he should have wanted to preside over the destruction of his country.

In his memoirs Blair cheerfully concedes his asylum policies were problematic and blames this on Holocaust hangover. See:  “Hitler's Revenge”: Blair Confirms Brimelow

But the great value of the Bower account is its emphasis on the fact that Blair was MIA on immigration policy during his administration. He did not spend energy like Straw or Roche advocating the transformation of the U.K. He just set an Open Borders policy (reversing the stance of the previous 25 years) and then averted his eyes.

Resentment of immigration from the 1960s severely damaged Labour Party support and was a large part of why they spent most of the next 30  years out of power. Why would Blair want to risk repeating this? (Since his retirement, his party has lost 2 consecutive elections.)

Since leaving office Blair and his notoriously avaricious wife have embarked on a program of self-enrichment quite unprecedented in British history for an ex-Prime minister – almost Clintonesque. Wikipedia says of his wealth

…estimates include figures of up to £100 million… A 2015 assertion.. concluded that Blair had acquired $90 million and a property portfolio worth $37.5 million in the eight years since he had left office.[215]
It is time to consider the hypothesis I offered in a similar case of aberrant behavior: Merkel: Gone Mad—Or Bribed? GOP Example Suggests The Latter