Fox News’ Greta van Susteren is an old-fashioned good-government enthusiast and she found the arrogant giveaway to be “stunning”:
VAN SUSTEREN: Tonight an update to the stunning news that On the Record reported last month. We told you that millions of illegal immigrants granted amnesty by President Obama’s executive actions are getting free money from the IRS. Many of them did not did not pay taxes. Well, it gets worse. Now IRS chief John Koskinen is writing a letter to Congress, standing by the IRS decision.
Remember, large quantities of free stuff are vital to the Obama plan of creating a permanent Democrat majority using grateful illegal aliens. The millions of newbies must be constantly reminded that the freebies come from their Democrat overlords, and for the benefits to continue, math-competent Republicans cannot be permitted to take office. New freebies must be added, despite the fiscal strain, to keep diverse moocher voters happy.
Curiously, the Republican Party has been a willing helper to its own destruction, most recently Speaker Boehner’s dramatic surrender to Democrats by removing a provision to deny funding for Obama’s amnesty. Apparently a luxurious personal future is more important to Speaker Boehner than preserving his party or a Constitutional America.
And word of free money will reach Moochico and points south, convincing still more to come.
IRS defends paying refunds to illegals who never filed taxes, By Stephen Dinan, Washington Times, March 2, 2015
The IRS is defending its decision to let illegal immigrants claim up to three years’ refunds on income even if they never paid income taxes, telling Congress in a new letter last week that agency lawyers have concluded getting a Social Security number triggers the ability to go back and ask for previous refunds.
President Obama’s new deportation amnesty could grant Social Security numbers to as many as 4 million illegal immigrants, making many of them eligible for tax refunds under the Earned Income Tax Credit even for years when they cheated on their taxes, by working off the books and not filing tax returns.
“Section 32 of the Internal Revenue Code requires an SSN on the return, but a taxpayer claiming the EITC is not required to have an SSN before the close of the year for which the EITC is claimed,” IRS Commissioner John Koskinen wrote in his letter to Sen. Charles E. Grassley on Wednesday.
The IRS’s chief lawyer had reached that conclusion in 2000, and the agency has newly confirmed it, Mr. Koskinen said.
Mr. Grassley called that a mockery of the law and said he will try to write a bill specifically prohibiting it.
“The tax code shouldn’t reward those who broke our immigration laws,” the Iowa Republican and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said in a statement.
The tax issue has become one of several flash points over Mr. Obama’s deportation amnesty, which grants tentative legal status, Social Security numbers and work permits to illegal immigrants who qualify. The newly legalized workers would also likely be eligible for driver’s licenses, and could even be more attractive than native-born workers to some employers trying to figure out ways to save money under Obamacare mandates.
Mr. Koskinen has previously said that illegal immigrants must be able to prove they worked off-the-books in order to claim the EITC, and it’s unclear how many of the population Mr. Obama is aiming to cover would be able to offer such proof.
The three-year time frame is part of general tax law, allowing anyone who didn’t file to go back and claim a refund for up to three previous year’s worth of taxes.
But the IRS lawyer’s ruling creates an odd circumstance where illegal immigrants who cheated by not paying taxes before can see if they would benefit from refunds. If they do benefit, they could file, but if they don’t benefit they could continue to avoid taxes for those years.
Mr. Obama’s new amnesty program does not require payment of back taxes.
Congress is currently snared in a fight over Mr. Obama’s deportation amnesty, with House Republicans insisting it be ended and trying to tie continued funding for the Homeland Security Department to provisions that would halt the amnesty.
Democrats are universally opposed, and Senate Republicans, caught in the middle, have begun to side with Democrats, arguing that homeland security money must keep flowing no matter what.
A federal court has put Mr. Obama’s expanded amnesty on hold, finding that the president likely skirted federal law in issuing the new policy without first going through a period of public comment and review.