Hypocrisy And Bipartisanship
June 20, 2008, 06:40 PM
A+
|
a-
Print Friendly and PDF

In a post called Is There A Pattern Here? If So, Is There A Name For It?,  John Rosenberg at the Discriminations blog writes that Barack Obama:

Of course, what John Rosenberg is hinting at is "hypocrite." He writes:.

"I know there’s a word for a pattern of saying one thing and doing the opposite, but I can’t call it to mind right now. Let’s see, it’s not “Messiah” (despite caring for the sick for the first time, halting the rise of the oceans, and healing the planet) ... it’s not “New Politician.” Oh well, I’m sure I’ll think of it in a while."

But hypocrisy is not necessarily a bad thing—the "homage vice pays to virtue," said La Rochefoucauld. In this case, it`s the principles that are wrong.

The problem with Obama`s leftism is what he plans to do if he`s elected, not that he`s sending his kids to private school. And McCain`s "bipartisanship" is a bug, not a feature. He`s called a maverick, because as, I wrote before, he`s

  • totally without party loyalty
  • unconcerned with the wishes of his constituents, or Americans in general
  • extremely friendly with members of the conventional media–he panders to them, they pander to him, and that’s why they call him a “maverick” rather than, say, a hatemonger.

,