From: George Weinbaum [e-mail him]
Douglas Belkin at the WSJ reports in "Colleges Set To Offer Exit Tests", August 26, 2013, that
"Next spring, seniors at about 200 U.S. colleges will take a new test that could prove more important to their future than final exams: an SAT-like assessment that aims to cut through grade-point averages and judge students` real value to employers". ... Studies show that grade-point averages, or GPAs, have been rising steadily for decades, but employers feel many new graduates aren`t prepared for the workforce. ... Even students with top grades from good schools many not `be able to write well or make an argument.` ... The CLA+ is scored on the 1600-point scale used by the SAT".
Harrumph. Haven`t we seen this before? Will Griggs prevent use of the CLA+? Is the Pope Catholic? Can Obama (to quote Belkin) "make an argument"? Will Caucasian college grads score 200-250 points higher on average on the CLA+ than Negro college grads?
James Fulford writes: The Griggs that Mr. Weinbaum refers to is Griggs v. Duke Power Co., a 1971 Supreme Court decisions that says that standards that have a “disparate impact” on minorities are ipso facto discriminatory. I’ve said—more than once—that:
"The message of Griggs and "disparate impact" theory: if minorities fail tests at a higher rate than whites, it`s the test that`s wrong."
Therefore all tests are always wrong, and employers can’t be allowed to find out which potential employees are the smartest—because the answer is never: Non-Asian Minorities.