California can never have a sound educational system as long as our borders are open. No amount of school bond money can keep up with the numbers of children who arrive in California each year.
We can form blue ribbon panels like the Quality Education Commission to study California schools. But in the end, it comes back to simply too many kids with too many needs coming to California too fast.
The open borders crisis exacerbates the already horrendous condition of California schools. Hardly a correct decision regarding schools has been made in the last four decades.
On February 5th, PBS aired First to Worst, a documentary that chronicles the dramatic fall of California schools over the last generation from first in the nation to at or near the bottom.
In one of the film's dramatic moments Jim Deasy, the superintendent of the Santa Monica-Malibu School District is asked what California parents would do if they could see the functional schools in Michigan, Iowa or Connecticut.
Without a pause, Deasy says, "They'd move."
In the 1960s, California schools were the envy of the nation. But according to the latest National Assessment of Education Progress, an annual evaluation of student achievement, California is currently tied for last among the 50 states in eighth-grade reading, and is 47th in fourth-grade reading.
Everything about our schools is in disrepair, according to First to Worst. Across the state, thousands of schools don't have the necessary resources for full class days, sports, special needs students, guidance counselors or even textbooks.
In many cases, schools rely on parent fund-raising and donations to help provide the so-called extras. Naturally, students from lower income families suffer the most.
First to Worst provides a time-line of variables that shows how California schools have become so dysfunctional:
Analysts are always promising that improvements are just around the corner. With only a few billion more we're told, California's schools can recapture their prominence.
Sorry, that is not the view from this corner. We can't keep up—period.
"I think the big picture is that California grows so rapidly. If we were like Pennsylvania, for example, where the population was steady or declining, we wouldn't be in this condition. The state of California grew six million people between 1980 and 1990. Several years our school enrollments went up by over 200,000 a year. We grew four million people between 1990 and 2000. So we're always having 100,000 or more students to accommodate, and the rapid growth often takes place in areas that don't have the financial wherewithal to build schools rapidly to meet them."