The report lists the percentage of each state's young people are undesirable enlistees because they: - are high school drop-outs - have a criminal record - have a health problem (typically, obesity).
Unfortunately, there's no information available on how much these problems overlap in individuals. Audacious merely subtracts from 100% the sum of the three problems to create his state rankings, which, presumably, overstates the severity of the problem somewhat. But, it's still pretty helpful as a ranking tool. Here are the Top Ten states with the most fit-to-serve youths:
|5. North Dakota||55.4|
|9. New Hampshire||51.9|
|10. South Dakota||51.5|
|45. New Mexico||23.1|
|46. South Carolina||22.4|
|51. District of Columbia||15.2|
Here's my advice to generals based on the fit-to-serve trends implicit in these state rankings. Don't plan on getting us into any more land wars in Asia.
(Here's the list of per capita enlistment rates in 2003. Montana was first at 67% above the national average, Alaska second, Wyoming third, and Maine fourth. DC and Puerto Rico were last, Utah next (Mormon missionary commitments?), followed by Rhode Island and Massachusetts.)
By the way, Minnesota comes in — Big surprise! — #2 on this measure of fit-to-serve at 59.2%.Â It seems to me that Minnesota almost always does well on state rankings of just about anything good.
In Lucky Jim, Kingsley Amis says, "There was no end to the ways in which nice things are nicer than nasty ones." Sociologically, we see positive correlations between most positive things: income, IQ, trust, cooperation, law-abidingness, kindness, future time orientation, health, beauty, and so forth and so on.
So, here's The Minnesota Challenge: find a state ranking of a broad-based social good where Minnesota's general population falls in the lower half of all states.
It has to be broad-based. It can't be something super-elite, like Nobel Laureates resident per capita or billionaires resident per capita. And it can't be weather-related, like Lack of Frostbite.