Well, we can't say assimilation isn't occurring. It is occurring. American politicians are assimilating to the Hispanic culture.
A Colorado congressional debate is being billed as the first Colorado Spanish-language debate between two candidates, neither of whom has Spanish as a first language.
From Colorado Congressional Candidates Debate Entirely In Spanish
By Greg Campbell, Freedom Outpost:
In a first for Colorado, a debate between candidates for Congress was done entirely in Spanish, even though it is neither candidate's native language.Republican incumbent Mike Coffman and Democratic challenger Andrew Romanoff answered questions entirely in Spanish for about 30 minutes Thursday night, hoping to appeal to the 6th Congressional District's sizable Latino population.Romanoff speaks fluently, having learned the language 25 years ago as a Peace Corp volunteer in Central America, Denver's Fox 31 reported. Coffman began learning Spanish about a year ago, after the district was redrawn to include neighborhoods with high populations of Hispanic voters.
Perish the thought that Coffman's new constituents use the civic language of the United States of America. No, this Republican congressman must learn Spanish in order to accommodate them! Is it any wonder the GOP is in the state it's in?
Because he is less fluent, the station reported, Coffman asked for and received the questions in advance and referred often to his notes.The House race is one of the most expensive in the country, and the debate was billed as the first all-Spanish debate between non-Hispanics.The men sparred over health care, the cost of college, and — of course — immigration.Coffman, who used to have a harder stance on immigration, has changed his views to reflect the district's new demographics.
Indeed, Numbers USA
gives Coffman a B grade for Career and Recent record, but an F- for his record in the current Congress (2013-2014). That indicates his immigration record has plummeted. But despite the fact that he's transformed into an open borders, Hispandering fanatic, he still gets flak for what he'd said before:
But Romanoff hammered him on past statements, including Coffman's praise of former Congressman Tom Tancredo and his past opposition to a bill allowing children brought into the country illegally to become citizens.
So saying something good about Tom Tancredo, and opposing a kid amnesty were considered bad.
Romanoff had his own past actions to answer for, including his support of a 2006 that would have required local police to contact federal authorities when they encountered someone they suspected of being in the country illegally."The law was an error," Romanoff said, quoted in the Colorado Springs Gazette.Latino voters were thrilled with the debate, which was broadcast on Spanish-language channels.
"The viewers, the audience, they're going to be able to hear from the candidates in their language, they're going to be able to understand what they stand for — it's very important," Dr. Rocio Saenz of the group Mi Familia Vota told Denver's Fox 31. "Also, what it says is that the Latinos are a decisive vote."
"Their language". Not the language of the country in which they reside and are citizens? Then again, are they all citizens?
And notice more triumphalism over the "decisive Latino vote".
The debate wasn't without its snarky moments. Romanoff couldn't resist pointing out his more complete mastery of Spanish while Coffman relied heavily on notes.
So ability to speak better Spanish than one's opponent is now an asset?
At the end of the debate, according to Fox 31, he said his remarks are "from my heart … it's not a script."
If that's true, his district is sunk.