James Fulford writes: VDARE.com has been covering the whole “build a wall” thing since long before Donald Trump made his astonishing appearance. (See Sam Francis’s The Future That Works (Despite Dubya): Illegal Immigration Can be Controlled, August 21, 2001.) In 2005, a Canadian journalist proposed the name “The New Muralism” for the world-wide movement, everywhere but the United States, to put fences in on borders. It’s not really that new, of course—I also blogged on what I called “The Old Muralism”—Hadrian’s Wall, right, that is still the dividing line between Scotland and England.
In 2006, I blogged that” Of course, outside North America, most land borders are guarded by some kind of fence. That's why, when Victor Davis Hanson was allowed to write recently against immigration in the Wall Street Journal, (a very rare occurrence) it was strange to see him refer to the "Great Wall Of America" as a "retrograde" and "seemingly absurd" solution, when obviously what it is is forward-looking and modern. [Mi Casa Es Su Casa | America's porous border enables Mexico's misrule, By Victor Davis Hanson, January 1, 2006 ]” As Amren.com’s Westley Parker reports below, the movement continues, and there are rumors that the next country to get one of these useful contrivances will be the United States Of America. [Border wall work begins in downtown Calexico By Associated Press, February 21, 2018]
Border walls work. That is why many countries have them.
Border walls are surprisingly common. Two-thirds of the world’s people live in countries that protect their borders with a wall or fence. Governments build these barriers because they are an effective way to keep people out.
Many critics of Donald Trump’s proposed border wall think walls don’t work—or at least would not work at the Mexican border. Senator Nancy Pelosi opposes what she calls “an immoral, ineffective, and expensive border wall.” Former DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano says: “You show me a 50-foot wall, and I’ll show you a 51-foot ladder.” Another former DHS Secretary, Michael Chertoff, opposes “a fence which someone can climb over with a ladder or tunnel under with a shovel.” Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas says, “A physical wall would be ineffective.”
These people are wrong. Walls have a very impressive record.
The Berlin WallEast Germans called the “Anti-Fascist Protection Rampart,” which ran the entire length of the East German/West German border. Its official purpose was to deter “fascist” aggression against the communist bloc, but in practice it kept East Germans from defecting to the West.
Defection was a serious problem. Between 1945 and 1961, over 3.5 million East Germans walked across the unguarded border. As the graph below demonstrates, the wall and the “rampart” cut defections more than 90 percent.
The wall was even more effective than this graph make it seem, because these figures include legal emigration. As the next graph shows, most of the movement to the West was legal. The wall and the “rampart” slashed defections to just 185 people per year.
Israel-Egypt Barrierinfiltrators,” the persistence of successful border incursions prompted Israel to raise the fence by 10 feet at certain undisclosed locations. The 2013 upgrade reduced illegal incursions at the border by an average of 99.4 percent. The improvements completed in January 2017 cut illegal immigration to zero. As of June 2017, not a single person had breached the fence.
Israeli West Bank Barrier
The 25-foot-tall barrier runs along the border between Israel and the Palestinian West Bank. For most of its length, it is a concrete wall, but in some places it is a fence. Construction began in 2002, in the midst of the Second Intifada, or armed Palestinian uprising. By 2012, 63 percent (277 miles) of the border was walled or fenced, but there has been little construction since then.Still, the barrier appears to have sharply reduced the number of Israelis killed by Palestinian terrorists by keeping them out of Israel. The following graph shows that the decline in the rate of Israeli deaths from terrorism closely tracks the construction of the barrier. Many factors affect the frequency of terror attacks, but making it harder for Palestinians to get into Israel is surely an important one.
Hungarian Border Fence
In 2015, more than a million migrants poured into Europe from North Africa and the Middle East. That year, 410,000 crossed the Hungarian border. On a per capita basis, that would be like 14,000,000 illegal aliens entering the United States in a single year.
In July 2015, Hungary began building a 13-foot-tall fence along its borders with Serbia and Croatia. The 109-mile fence was completed on October 16, 2015 at a cost of roughly $106 million.The following graph is of daily apprehensions at the border during October 2015. Completing the fence cut the number of daily crossings essentially to zero.
The fence has not been perfect. Following a general increase in migrant inflows to Europe, there was a slight increase in illegal crossings in 2016, which led to an average 130 apprehensions per day in June.
In July, Hungarian President Viktor Orban sent 10,000 police and soldiers to the border. Since then, the number of illegal crossings leading to apprehension has ranged from 0 to 11 per day.
U.S. Border Fence – Southwest Border Sectors
The Secure Fence Act, passed by Congress in 2006, authorized the Department of Homeland Security to build 652 miles of fencing along the US-Mexico border. Ideally, a fence should cover the entire area it is meant to protect, but the law left large areas unguarded.
As the graph below shows, despite these shortcomings, the number of illegal aliens caught by US border patrol fell dramatically as the length of the southwest barrier increased—evidence that even a limited barrier can deter illegal immigration.
However, the picture is complicated. As shown in the graph below, the number of border patrol agents increased dramatically while the fence was being built, which makes it hard to separate the effect of the fence from that of increased patrols.
Moreover, many factors affect the number of people trying to cross illegally from Mexico: the American economy and demand for labor, Mexico’s economy and demand for labor, the effectiveness of Mexico’s own border control against immigrants from third countries, and the perception in Latin America and elsewhere of how diligently the United States is enforcing its immigration laws.
However, we can approach the effectiveness of the fence from a different perspective. The border with Mexico is 1,954 miles long and there are only 652 miles of fence. The fence has been built where the border was easiest to cross, but some illegal immigrants go around the fence to cross in more difficult areas. The Border Patrol is not catching all illegal immigrants. However, the presence of more agents at the border should mean that people who cross the border illegally are more likely to be caught—which increases figures for apprehensions.
If a border fence were not a deterrent at all, it would not reduce the number of border crossers. If, at the same time, patrols were increased, we would expect a rise in apprehensions, because more people would be caught. What actually happened between 2005 and 2016 was fence construction, more patrols, and fewer apprehensions. This is strong evidence that the fence sharply reduced the number of illegal crossings even while those who did cross were more likely to be caught. Completing the fence would presumably cut illegal crossings even further.
Widespread Use of Barriers
Border barriers are the international norm. Only 25 percent of the world’s population live in countries that do not have a border fence or wall—something far more substantial and lengthy than a fence at a border check point. Ten percent of the world’s population live on islands with no land borders. Fully 65 percent live behind barriers.
Only Western nations are condemned for building barriers, even though other regions are more likely to have them. As the graph below shows, East Asians, North Africans, South Asians, Middle Easterners, and Central Asians are all more likely than Europeans or the inhabitants of other majority-white countries to live behind barriers.
Only Latin Americans and sub-Saharan Africans are less likely to live in countries with barriers. Nations that are unattractive to illegal immigrants do not build walls.
Here are photographs of some of the border fences and walls found around the world.Westley Parker is an author at American Renaissance