Dearbornistan Restricts Free Speech to Protect Islam
Print Friendly and PDF
What has happened to Americans' right to free speech when a citizen is jailed for merely planning a protest?

Islamic immigration happened.

Any activity unfriendly to Islam is dicey in Dearbornistan, which is about one-third Middle Eastern and where more than 60 percent of students in the public schools are Arab. For example, several Americans were jailed last year for handing out Christian literature at an Arab festival.

The latest affront to the First Amendment was the imprisonment of Rev. Terry Jones for planning speech critical of Islam. He never got to protest in front of the mosque at all but he was jailed for thought crimes against Muslims.

Notice how Muslims' reputation for intimidation and violence works to exempt them from normal level of criticism we all experience in this society.

Pastor seeking to protest at mosque briefly jailed, Associated Press, April 22, 2011

A Florida pastor's planned demonstration outside a Michigan mosque was scuttled Friday after a jury determined the protest would constitute a breach of the peace and he was briefly jailed for refusing to pay what authorities called a "peace bond."

The Rev. Terry Jones, whose past rhetoric against Muslims has inflamed anti-Western sentiment in Afghanistan, said he refused to pay the $1 bond because to do so would violate his freedom of speech. He later paid it and was released.

Jones had planned a demonstration Friday evening outside the Islamic Center of America in Dearborn, a suburb of Detroit that is home to one of the largest Muslim communities in the nation. An estimated 30,000 people in Dearborn, about a third of the city's population, trace their roots to the Middle East.

Prosecutors worried the protest would lead to violence and asked Dearborn District Judge Mark Somers to intervene. Somers conducted a one-day jury trial to determine whether Jones would pose a threat to peace. They did, and Somers then ordered Jones and an associate to post the bond to ostensibly cover the costs of police protection.

While largely symbolic, the bond also came with conditions that included a prohibition on Jones from going to the mosque or the adjacent property for three years.

Somers said he spoke to the jury after they reached their verdict and they told him they were concerned with the "time, place and manner and not the content of the speech."

But Robert Sedler, a constitutional law professor at Wayne State University, called the entire proceedings unconstitutional. He said the U.S. Supreme Court has found that it's the job of the police to protect speakers at such events and said it is unconstitutional to require protesters to post a bond for police protection.

"What basis did the state have for arguing that they would breach the peace?" Sedler said. "It's a matter of First Amendment requirement: The government can't stop a speaker from speaking because of danger from a hostile crowd."

The state law allowing a judge to require a bond "for preservation of public peace" originally dates to 1846. As recently as 1999, the state Court of Appeals upheld it as constitutional in a case involving feuding neighbors who sought peace bonds against each other.

A burning of the Quran in March at Jones' church in Gainesville, Fla., led to a series of violent protests in Afghanistan that killed more than a dozen people. Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said fears that Jones could incite violent counter-protests led them to court.

"These proceedings were solely about public safety. This was never about prohibiting free speech or fearing rioting but about a situation that could potentially place the public in danger in Dearborn," Worthy said.

But Dawud Walid, the executive director of the Michigan chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said Jones and Sapp should have been allowed to demonstrate outside the mosque to show that Muslims in Dearborn would not have rioted in response.

"Mr. Jones has been made as a martyr for free speech," Walid said.

Dearborn had denied Jones a permit to protest outside the mosque and offered alternative sites, but Jones wouldn't move the location. He refused to pay the bond to make a point about freedom of speech, said David Grisham, a pastor from Amarillo, Texas, who came to Detroit to take part in the demonstration with Jones.

Earlier in the day Friday, Jones said if the court hearing went too long, he would return to protest next Friday. He did not return a telephone message left by The Associated Press Friday night seeking comment.

Jones acted as his own attorney and told the jury in his closing argument that the mosque, one of the largest in the country, was chosen because his protest is against "a radical element of Islam."

"All we want to do is walk, demonstrate, protest on an area that already belongs to you, to the city," Jones said. "We are not accusing this mosque. We are not accusing the people of Dearborn. We are not accusing all Muslims."

Print Friendly and PDF