Vimeo CEO Anjali Sud, daughter of Indian immigrants, is the latest corporate Cultural Marxist to deny InfoWars’ Alex Jones the traditional Anglo-Saxon freedom of speech [Alex Jones flees to Vimeo, is immediately banned there as well, by Zack Ford, Think Progress, August 13, 2018). But it’s vital to note that this latest example of tech totalitarianism has nothing to do with Jones’ conspiracy theories—and everything to do with Jones’ belated emphasis to immigration patriotism. Bottom line: our Ruling Class is simply desperate to repress awareness of their Election of A New People until it’s too late.
The war on Alex Jones has been incredible to watch, with CNN dedicating multiple months to attack a humble Texan who started out doing a public access TV show in Austin in the late 1990s and ended up playing a major role in the 2016 election, hosting a 30-minute interview with then-candidate Donald Trump before the primaries began. [Donald Trump just did a big interview with a famous conspiracy theorist and was asked about impeaching Obama, by Colin Campbell, Business Insider, December 2, 2015]
Jones explored the official account of the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting and in February of this year called Parkland School student turned gun control crusader David Hogg a “crisis actor.” Supposedly this is not what got him de-platformed from Facebook, Apple, Disqus, Spotify, and YouTube, but rather violations of "hate speech" codes. [YouTube, Facebook, and Apple’s ban on Alex Jones, explained | And why some on the right are calling it “collusion.”, By Jane Coaston, Vox, August 6, 2018]
Vimeo CEO Anjali Sud, daughter of Indian immigrants, is the latest corporate Cultural Marxist to deny InfoWars’ Alex Jones the traditional Anglo-Saxon freedom of speech [Alex Jones flees to Vimeo, is immediately banned there as well, by Zack Ford, Think Progress, August 13, 2018). But it’s vital to note that this latest example of tech totalitarianism has nothing to do with Jones’ conspiracy theories—and everything to do with Jones’ belated emphasis to immigration patriotism. Bottom line: our Ruling Class is simply desperate to repress awareness of their Election of A New People until it’s too late.
The war on Alex Jones has been incredible to watch, with CNN dedicating multiple months to attack a humble Texan who started out doing a public access TV show in Austin in the late 1990s and ended up playing a major role in the 2016 election, hosting a 30-minute interview with then-candidate Donald Trump before the primaries began. [Donald Trump just did a big interview with a famous conspiracy theorist and was asked about impeaching Obama, by Colin Campbell, Business Insider, December 2, 2015]
Jones explored the official account of the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting and in February of this year called Parkland School student turned gun control crusader David Hogg a “crisis actor.” Supposedly this is not what got him de-platformed from Facebook, Apple, Disqus, Spotify, and YouTube, but rather violations of "hate speech" codes. [YouTube, Facebook, and Apple’s ban on Alex Jones, explained | And why some on the right are calling it “collusion.”, By Jane Coaston, Vox, August 6, 2018]
Earlier by Allan Wall: Forget Supposed Russian Meddling—Why Is Flagrant Mexican Meddling Ignored By Our Political Class?
Anyone who has glanced at a newspaper in the last two years knows Russian meddling is a big issue for the Never Trumpers. Globalist neocon Max Boot—who announced that “The Republican Party is dead” in the LA Times, May 8, 2016 and quit the party the day after Donald Trump won [I left the Republican Party. Now I want Democrats to take over, by Max Boot, Washington Post, July 4, 2018] has flatly stated that Trump needed the Russians to win.
While the intelligence agencies are silent on the impact of Russia’s attack, outside experts who have examined the Kremlin campaign—which included stealing and sharing Democratic Party emails, spreading propaganda online and hacking state voter rolls—have concluded that it did affect an extremely close election decided by fewer than 80,000 votes in three states. Clint Watts, a former FBI agent, writes in his recent book, “Messing with the Enemy,” that “Russia absolutely influenced the U.S. presidential election,” especially in Michigan and Wisconsin, where Trump’s winning margin was less than 1 percent in each state.
[Without the Russians, Trump Wouldn’t Have Won, The Washington Post, July 24, 2018.]
Of course, we ought to stop any foreign meddling in our elections. But it’s funny how concerned today’s Leftists now are about Russian intervention. Back in the 1980s, the “Lion of the Senate,” Sen. Ted Kennedy, tried to collaborate with the Russians to prevent Reagan’s re-election. It never hurt his standing in the Democratic Party or in the Mainstream Media [Ted Kennedy Made Secret Overtures To Russia To Prevent Ronald Reagan’s Re-Election , by Kevin Mooney, The Daily Signal, December 14, 2016].
Oh, that’s right. The Russians were commies back then. The Democrats were never this hysterical about them at the height of the Cold War, or during the Vietnam or Korean wars, or during the Ames, Hanssen or Walker spy scandals.
The real effect of Russian meddling on the 2016 election is way overblown. Leftist Russian scholar Stephen Cohen, in a YouTube appearance with Boot, called it “low level stuff.” ["You are Criminalizing Diplomacy", July 30, 2018] The Russians didn’t create the divisions in our deeply-divided country.
See also: J. Philippe Rushton’s VDARE.com Archive
When the British-Canadian psychologist J. Philippe Rushton (1943-2012) proved—almost 30 years ago—that blacks are evolved to “live fast and die young,” he was threatened with prosecution, declared a “loony” by Ontario’s Attorney General, and forced to conduct his University of Western Ontario lectures via video to avoid disruption and violence. Perhaps something has changed for the better since 1989: a study published this week by a group of British researchers, further proving Rushton’s argument, has been reported in the Main Stream Media with no threat to the lives of the academics involved at all. [Dementia rates higher among black people, new study finds, By Alex Matthews-King, Independent, August 8, 2018]
The scientists, based at the prestigious University College London, used a sample of 2.5 million UK residents, including over 66,000 dementia patients. They found that, of all the races in the UK, blacks have the highest rates of dementia. [Trends in dementia diagnosis rates in UK ethnic groups: analysis of UK primary care data, By T.M. Pham et al., Clinical Epidemiology, August 8, 2018]
Rushton presented, back in 1989, and in more detail in his subsequent book Race, Evolution and Behavior, his “Differential-K Theory” of racial differences. He argued that all species—and all subspecies—are positioned on a spectrum between a “fast Life History strategy” (an r-strategy) and a “slow Life History strategy” (a K-strategy).
An r-strategy develops in unstable yet easy environment. In such an ecology, you could be wiped out at any moment, so you evolve to “live fast and die young.” Accordingly, you invest all your energy in mating—in order to have as many offspring as possible with as many partners as possible in the hope that some will survive. You invest very little energy in nurture, because such energy could easily go to waste.
This r-strategy is reflected in every aspect of your “life history”—you’re born younger, you reach developmental milestones younger, you go through puberty younger, lose your virginity younger, you age more quickly and you die younger. You also advertise your genetic quality as conspicuously as you can—as the end is always nigh—leading to large sexual characteristics, strong body odor, and, if you’re a peacock, a massive, colorful tail.
It’s surreal to have lived through an event that is even now being mythologized. It’s nothing short of infuriating to see a mythology growing up that is almost an exact opposite of what actually happened. The lies being told about what happened at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville VA a year ago this weekend are so outrageous and so demonstrably untrue that it makes you question all of history.
What other historical events and movements have we been lied to about? And can you prop up an entire failing system based on lies?
Main Stream Media coverage throughout the country is being dominated by commemorations of the ill-fated rally [Charlottesville making final preparations for anniversary of deadly rally, by Talya Cunningham, WAVY, August 10, 2018]. The media is also eagerly hyping the second “Unite the Right 2” rally in front of the White House even though few participants in the original rally seem to be going [It’s right there in front of the White House.’: Is D.C. ready for Unite the Right? By Caroline Simon, USA Today, August 10, 2018]. The obvious intention: to claim the Alt Right has been defeated after almost no one shows up.
But it’s more likely that patriots have simply learned their lesson: not to put their trust in the law, the police, or the First Amendment. Flagrantly-biased law enforcement since last August has convinced many on the Dissident Right that they not only will not be defended by police, they will not even be permitted to defend themselves. Since the release of the Heaphy Report on the events in Charlottesville, it has been undeniable that the local police department deliberately fostered a climate of instability and unrest so it would have an excuse to shut down the rally.
This chaos culminated with James Fields driving into a crowd of screaming protesters, an act which led to the death of Heather Heyer, now being celebrated as a martyr. Of course, as Ann Coulter bravely pointed out earlier this week, Fields had good reason to fear for his life. In the end, he may well be acquitted like George Zimmerman or found guilty of a lesser offense—unless, as Coulter half-joked, “his defense lawyer is planning on intentionally throwing the case for the greater good.” Of course, if Fields is acquitted, we can probably expect another riot.
