But ... both were caucus states rather than primaries. And I`m starting to get suspicious.
That seems to be a pattern — Romney does well in caucuses and loses in primaries. Before today, he won caucuses in Wyoming, Nevada, and Maine, and a primary in his "home" state of Michigan. Perhaps that`s just because the more dedicated, public affairs-oriented individuals who show up at caucuses have carefully assessed each candidate`s positions and resumes and made a responsible choice for Romney.
Or maybe ... it`s because Mormons keep packing the caucuses.
Unfortunately, I can`t find exit polls for Colorado and Minnesota, but we do know that Romney`s victory in the Nevada caucus was boosted by Mormons making up 25% of the GOP caucusers and going close to 100% for Romney. So, I have my suspicions about his other caucus victories. If anybody has any evidence one way or another, let me know.
Oh, wait, Romney did do really, really well in one primary today, where he got 90% of the vote, so maybe my suspicions are paranoid.
Except ... that state was Utah.
Mormons—they`d take over the world in a couple more generations ... if only they were allowed to drink caffeinated beverages!
This is not to say that Mormons can`t be dedicated, public affairs-oriented individuals. In fact, I would expect that they are a little above average in this regard. It`s just that the discreet charm of Mitt Romney just seems to be a little too discreet to win many elections where Mormons don`t make up a sizable fraction of the voters.
In other states today, Romney won in caucuses in Alaska (44%) and in primaries in Montana (38%), North Dakota (36%), and in his "home" state of Massachusetts with 51%. That`s a little better than McCain`s 47% in his home state of Arizona, but not as good as Huckabee`s 61% in Arkansas. In contrast, Obama won 64% in Illinois and Clinton 57% in New York. So, to know McCain and Romney is apparently not to love them.