Help VDARE.COM Post Juan Mann And Other Immigration Patriots!
12/12/2005
A+
|
a-
Print Friendly and PDF

[With starving citizen children, Hannah Claire and Alexander...]

Peter Brimelow writes: Tonight we post a column by Juan Mann exposing an unnoticed problem with the GOP House Leadership immigration bill, which many greeted with relief because it apparently ignored the White House drive for amnesty. (Scroll down to link, conveniently below contribution information). Juan Mann is a national treasure, a lawyer able to match the Treason Lobby immigration lawyers line by line and provide solid ammunition that immigration patriots in Washington D.C. can actually use. His regular appearance on VDARE.COM is an example of how we have provided a forum for writers with the differing types of knowledge and skills needed to reverse America's immigration disaster. Some are funnier, but all are vital. But we can only keep doing this if YOU help!

It's that time of year again.

It's Christmas.

Soon it will be New Year—and the end of fiscal 2005.

It's the season for VDARE.COM to run its annual War Against Christmas Competition, looking for the most outrageous attempt to abolish Christmas.

And it's also time for us to ask for money.

I don't like doing this. But my advisors tell us this because I still haven't developed the shamelessness necessary to build an institution. Christmas appeals are a critical part of the non-profit world, just as Christmas sales are to commerce. People are in a holly, jolly mood. They are also thinking, with some corner of their minds, about the need to pay taxes on 2005 income and capital gains (remember, we can accept stock – see below).

Donations to VDARE.COM are tax-deductible. 

And we are indeed building an institution at VDARE.COM. Of course, we shouldn't have had to do it. Established foundations and media mouthpieces should have addressed the issue of nation-breaking mass immigration, both legal and illegal.

But they didn't. In fact, I founded VDARE.COM—after some testing, the first public announcement was emailed out on Christmas Eve 1999—because I and others had been extruded from one such media mouthpiece, and immigration criticism abandoned.

In a way, it's not surprising. It's a common observation in business history (I daylight as a financial journalist) that corporations don't survive "technological discontinuities"—a radical change in the markets they serve. Instead, new corporations come along.

I sometimes wonder what American institutions—think tanks, magazines, even political parties—will survive the radical changes looming because of our ongoing immigration disaster. I am sure, however, that VDARE.COM will be ready.

But, in the short run, it means we have our work cut out for us at VDARE.COM. We have had to press fifty years of institution-building into just over five.

Fortunately, the internet makes miracles possible, and we now have hundreds of thousands of readers each month. But it takes relentless hard work—and money to pay our dedicated writers, and the many more we'd like to run.

In fact, the Christmas story is a heartening one for us at VDARE.COM. We posted a story about the War Against Christmas on Christmas Day 1999 (not sure how I managed that, the children were very small) and began our first War Against Christmas Competition in 2000.

At that time, no-one ever mentioned the subject and, in fact, the Establishment mouthpiece mentioned above dropped discussing it as soon as I was eliminated. Now, as I look at the emails coming in, I am simply amazed at how widespread the resistance to the Khristmaskampf has become—how many individuals are rebelling and demanding that stores not use the Christophobic "Happy Holidays" and that Christmas Trees be called, well, Christmas Trees. Several major media figures have taken up the cause, and even (wow!) a few politicians.

The battle has hardly been joined. But right now it looks as if the War Against Christmas could turn into perhaps the most extraordinary examples of cultural backlash since the anti-Vietnam War movement accidentally elected Richard Nixon in 1968.

Modesty prevents me from claiming this was all due to VDARE.COM, although I do know that our wonderful readers have frequently emailed our Christmas material to the major media figures etc. in question. But I do think we helped—and that we blazed a trail.

I also think that this is what will happen with the issue of mass immigration. Exactly as with the War Against Christmas, resistance to the Washington elite's "Abolish America" policy is now everywhere and shows every sign that it is about to break out of the control of the usual cultural police.

Again, I don't claim this is all due to VDARE.COM—or to my own anti-immigration book, Alien Nation, published ten years ago this year. But I do claim we were first, and that we were right, and that we helped the process along.

These are some themes that we hope to inject, in our viral marketing way, into public debate next year:

  • Reporting the proportion of new jobs going to immigrants. Native-born Americans are being crowded out by newcomers undercutting  wages and, in effect, stealing health and educational benefits for which the Native born pay—as shown by Edwin S. Rubenstein's VDARE.COM American Worker Displacement Index.

  • Chronicling immigrant-imported corruption. As in Nicholas Stix' article on the NYPD scandal.

  • Naming the guilty immigration enthusiasts. As in Bryanna Bevens' expose of the Western Growers Association.

  • Naming the guilty media mouthpieces. As in Joe Guzzardi's coverage of the Sacramento Bee/ Diana Griego Erwin scandal.

  • Offering solutions. As in Steve Sailer's buyout proposal for France's Muslims.

Our Fall fundraising drive raised $16,000. We hope our Christmas Campaign will raise $30,000. (We'll need some big donors!) That will go a considerable way towards stabilizing VDARE.COM after a turbulent year.

If this works, I won't be bothering VDARE.COM readers until, oh,- maybe Easter!

(There's a war against that too!)


  • We are delighted see donations of any size—$10, 100, $1,000, $10,000. But we do feel especially good about the larger ones!

  • Special to 2005! Congress has enacted the Katrina Emergency Tax Relief Act, which effectively permits an individual to deduct cash contributions up to 100 percent of income. THIS IS THE YEAR TO GIVE BIG! (Email [email protected] for details)

  • And don't forget - you can give stock! You could help us more at no cost by avoiding capital gains tax! (Email [email protected] for details)
Print Friendly and PDF