Earlier: THE FULFORD FILE: “You Swine Happy Now?” MSM, Complicit In Disgruntled Minority Massacres, Desperately Suppressing VA Shooter’s Race

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was recently cut off on Fox for saying perfectly true things about George Soros’s sponsorship of progressive (i.e.. pro-crime) District Attorneys.

You can see that the female interviewers look oddly distracted before they eventually say "I’m not sure we need to bring George Soros into this."

Newt Gingrich: "The number one problem in almost all the cities is George Soros-elected, left-wing, antipolice pro-criminal district attorneys..."

Fox hos: "I’m not sure we need to bring George Soros into this."

Newt: "Okay... So, it’s verboten?"

Long awkward silence. pic.twitter.com/tl4CgGcrzI

— Justin Baragona (@justinbaragona) September 16, 2020

That’s because they’re listening on their headsets to their producer, literally “the man behind the curtain,” who knows that talking about George Soros is (as Gingrich surmised) “verboten.” It’s a perfect example of Narrative Control in action.

Narrative Control really is a Thing. And it’s been particularly in evidence this year, as the George Floyd Hoax has led to the Black Lives Matter Blood Libel on White America, all obviously designed to mau-mau Americans into voting for Joe Biden. It means that the national Main Stream Media is outright suppressing news that contradicts the Black Victims-White Oppressors morality myth.

Most recent example:

• Cassandra Fairbanks of Gateway Pundit has a story about a black man named Michael E. Rhynes (pictured above the headline) wearing a Justice For Breonna Taylor shirt who walked into white bar owned by a former law enforcement officer and shot three people.

The suspect was smiling from ear to ear as he was arrested for the shooting at Bungalow Joe’s Bar and Grill.

Black Lives Matter Activist Wearing ‘Justice for Breonna Taylor’ Shirt Walked into a Louisville Bar and Murdered Three People, September 20, 2020

(Taylor was a black woman shot during a drug raid when her boyfriend fired at police officers—her family has received a $12m settlement, but black celebrities are still crying “Murder”).

This story, as usual with politically-motivated black-on-white killings, is getting absolutely no traction in the MSM, except for on the usual “man arrested” basis [Bungalow Joe’s owner asking for community’s help after 3 customers were shot and killed, by Faith King, WAVE3 Louisville, September 20, 2020]

My acid test of whether news is going to be allowed to be part of the national Narrative: whether it appears on the New York Times’s web site. The NYT is still the bellwether for the rest of U.S. media.

Thus the local police-blotter incident of Trayvon Martin’s unsuccessful attack on George Zimmerman, in which no crime was ever shown to have been committed by anyone but the deceased, has 1, 044 NYT mentions since 2012.

But Michael E. Rhynes, the Bungalow Joe killer, does not currently appear.

• The New York Times still has no stories about Paul and Lidia Marino, two elderly whites shot by a black man, motive unreported, while visiting their son’s grave in a Veteran’s Cemetery in Joe Biden’s Delaware.

The story has so little traction that Biden himself made a public appearance in the same cemetery on Veterans’ Day 19 days after the murder [Joe Biden, Wearing Mask, Appears in Public at a Veterans Memorial, NYT, May 25, 2020] and no one mentioned it but Steve Sailer.

But the New York Times has 56 stories about white teenager Kyle Rittenhouse, who used a rifle to defend himself against three men.

Previously: The DACA Disgrace: Judicial Nominees Must Now Face An Immigration Litmus Test

Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death puts President Trump in both a powerful and a tricky position. We are just a few weeks away from the November election and whoever Trump selects as his nominee could decide the winner. This is one of the most important decisions of Trump’s presidency, if not the most important. It is vital he selects someone who can be counted on to uphold solid immigration principles and not side with the open borders lobby. We need a justice who will strike down birthright citizenship, defend the executive branch’s aggressive enforcement of immigration law, side with American workers over the cheap labor lobby, stand firm against the dubious complaints of non-citizens, and understand the constitutionality of travel bans.

The most likely candidates and where they stand on immigration (as far as we can tell):

• Amy Coney Barrett

Amy Coney Barrett is a Trump-appointed federal judge. She is the favorite among social conservatives and was on Trump’s shortlist when he picked Brett Kavanaugh for the court in 2018. She’s the most likely candidate if Trump decides to nominate a woman.

Her record on immigration is fairly good. In a dissent, she defended the president’s public charge rule, which denies permanent residency to immigrants who rely on government assistance.

However, there are questions. Barrett, as Ann Coulter points out on Twitter, has said she has to recuse herself from cases where her Catholic faith precludes from a proper judgement. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ notorious embrace of Open Borders may influence her to vote for liberal immigration policies. [Amy Coney Barrett Is Not a Safe Pick for the Supreme Court.  Her writings on faith and jurisprudence should worry conservatives, by John Zmirak, Human Events, September 19, 2019]. She also has two adopted black children from Haiti, which may influence her decisions as well. BREAKING: Coney Barrett is reportedly the front-runner.

If so, he will lose. https://t.co/eMLgF7osAz

— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 19, 2020

• James Ho

Ho is another Trump-appointed federal judge. He was recently added to the president’s judicial list and is a favorite among establishment White House staffers. He is an immigrant from Taiwan.

But Ho is a non-starter with immigration patriots. He is a firm advocate of birthright citizenship and vociferously opposes any changes to this horrible standard [Disloyal Elements in Trump Administration Plan to Sneak Birthright Citizenship Activist onto Supreme Court, Revolver News, September 17, 2020]. That’s enough to disqualify him.

[Excerpted from the latest Radio Derb, now available exclusively through VDARE.com]

Here’s a peek into Woke Capitalism. I shall tread carefully in this segment. I am working from inside information, and I don't want anyone to lose his job for being associated with an outlet as hatefully hateful as VDARE.com.

The particular corner of capitalism featured in this story is the fine old financial-services firm of Goldman Sachs. You may recall Goldman Sachs signaling their virtue to the world back in in January when they announced that they'd only do business with firms that had at least one diverse board member, which I think means not a straight white male.

Well, a friend of mine is employed at Goldman Sachs, and he's been passing stuff on to me: stuff like this, which I reproduce with my friend's permission, some names redacted

It's a memo that was prominently featured on the main page of the internal Goldman Sachs web site August 27th, for the edification of all employees. The title of the memo is: Why Language Can Be One of Our Biggest Allies at Goldman Sachs. The main text is over seven hundred words, too long for me to read out in its entirety, so I'll just cherry-pick a few representative quotes, with links added.

• As a firm, we made the decision to capitalize the "B" in Black consistently in all communications…on June 5, weeks before the Associated Press officially changed its writing style on June 19.

The time is long gone when CNN Talking Head Dr. Sanjay Gupta could flatly assert that Covid-19  “doesn’t discriminate based on race.” It does, albeit for reasons that are not fully understood. Now a study in the Journal of the American Medical Association has presented evidence that a previously overlooked factor may be relevant: race differences in a gene which impacts how easily you can stop Covid-19 entering your body. 

There are clear race differences in the prevalence and deadliness of Covid-19 and, as I have previously reported, these differences persist even if you control for the socioeconomic factors that the Left insist are responsible for the disparities. For example, South Asian doctors in Britain’s NHS are much more likely to succumb than white doctors.  One factor for which a strong case has been advanced: the ability to synthesise UV Light into Vitamin D. Non-whites, in Western countries suffer from Vitamin D deficiency because their dark skin renders them less able to absorb UV Light and so synthesise it into Vitamin D. Europeans’ white skin probably evolved in winter darkness for this very reason.

The new study—“Racial/Ethnic Variation in Nasal Gene Expression of Transmembrane Serine Protease 2 (TMPRSS2)”—was published in the prestigious journal on September 10^th and was carried out by three researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York [Supinda Bunyavanich; Chantal Grant, MD; and Alfin Vicencio]. It sets out to make sense of why African-Americans suffer a death rate from Covid-19 that is around three times their proportion of the U.S. population.