January 30, 2008
Latest Treason Lobby Scam: “Undocumented” = “Unbanked”
By
Brenda Walker
We in
Mexifornia live on the front lines of
diversity. Every day politicians, business and the
academy work to spread the doctrine of
increasing inclusion, sometimes with the discovery
of a
new group of underprivileged foreigners who need our
attention. Our
political leaders in particular
are highly attuned to any
alleged discomfort on the part of Mexicans—or
anyone else under the sun
who can make their way here.
The latest attempt at
heart-tuggery: the tribulation suffered by “The
Unbanked”—as imagined by California’s illustrious
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and his compadre
Bill Clinton in the prestigious Wall Street Journal
[Beyond
Payday Loans, Jan 24, 2008].
"The American dream is
founded on the belief that people who work hard and play
by the rules will be able to earn a good living, raise a
family in comfort and retire with dignity.
“But that dream is
harder to achieve for millions of Americans because they
spend too much of their hard-earned money on
fees to cash their paychecks or pay off
high-priced loans meant to carry them over until
they get paid at work.
Here is one initiative
that can unite progressives and conservatives as well as
business leaders and community activists: helping the
‘unbanked’ enter the financial mainstream by opening
checking and savings accounts, and working
collaboratively with financial institutions and
community groups to develop and market products that
work for this untapped market. This will put money in
the pockets of individuals and grow the economy. And it
won't cost taxpayers a dime."
On the surface, this underwhelming
policy suggestion seems
a harmless snoozer. Remember how
Bill Clinton peppered his Presidency with
insignificant programs that kept up the appearance
of relevance and progress? In the policy area, the
recommendation is that banks should offer more
starter accounts with features designed for the
Unbanked demographic.
But the op-ed does not
identify honestly many of this proposal’s true
beneficiaries—illegal
aliens. The piece slyly combines groups to hide that
fact, saying, "Approximately 11% of California
households, including 25% of Latino and African-American
households, do not have a checking account." The
words "immigrant" or "alien" do
not appear.
A report from
Scarborough Research (PDF)
showed the communities with the highest percentages of
"unbanked" were also home to many illegal aliens
(e.g. Fresno, El Paso, Los Angeles, Dallas).
The Unbanked are
illegal aliens, first and foremost, though there are
certainly some citizens who
plain don't like banks and manage somehow to avoid
using them.
Reasonable observers
have to ask, however, whether this "problem"
exists at all. Illegals
can't cash their checks? Banks don't mind giving
them hundreds of thousands of dollars in mortgages, or
at least were happy to do so a few months ago.
A Wall Street Journal
article,
How the Subprime Mess Hit Poor Immigrant Groups
[By Jonathan Karp and Miriam Jordan, December 6, 2007]
focused on a Brazilian-church-based
mortgage scam located in South San Francisco.
"Ms.
Costa, the housekeeper, secured a $713,000
sub-prime mortgage. In another instance, a Brazilian
baby sitter borrowed $495,000. Now, the home buyers are
beset by foreclosures and additional stains on their
already-tainted credit. "
The reader learns
much later in the article that Ms. Costa is an
illegal alien.
VDARE.COM's own
one-time banker
Joe Guzzardi described in 2005 how
traditional financial standards were thrown under the
bus for the quick profits of home-loan scams that
targeted foreigners:
Mortgages For Illegal Aliens: Are Banks The Treason
Industry?.
"Not surprisingly, given
my rigid financial training, I am aghast at the newest
trend in accommodating illegal aliens—home
mortgages.
“No matter how hard I
try, I simply cannot conceive of any bank granting
home loans to applicants who cannot produce a social
security card.
“Nor can I for the life
of me imagine proposing to my former superiors a new
type of loan whose success is dependent on
violating federal law on several levels.”
And beyond the big money in home loans,
greedy American banks are willing to accept the bogus
matricula ID card that most
Mexican banks refuse. Foreigners are welcome to open
bank accounts with the junk identification that
any terrorist can buy on a local street corner.
As
Ed Rubenstein has observed, the Unbanked do not
leave
a telltale paper trail that could inform authorities
of their general whereabouts. Evidence indicates that
being a bankless, cash-embracing foreigner is a rational
choice, not an instance of victimhood.
What does the Arnold and
Bill collaboration indicate? They are broadcasting the
message south that nothing has really changed in the
USA, and the welcome mat remains out for the
willing workers of America's
slavery-lite economy. Most Democrats and some
Republicans are working to expand the array of benefits
to make life easier for illegal foreigners. Mexicans and
others may have heard about tougher enforcement,
particularly in states like
Arizona where attrition is working. But most places
operate as before, despite the obvious damage.
California is in the
midst of a
worsening financial crisis caused largely by
spending
$10 billion yearly on foreign squatters, but the
Governor continues to invite them. His transformation
from outside reformer to
opportunist political hack has been rapid indeed.
The Unbanked initiative
takes a non-existent problem as an excuse to peddle
financial services to a group
which the banks hope to ensnare, perhaps with an eye
to profitable
remittance
transfers.
It's another effort to
diminish national standards and institute a more
globalist system.
Brenda Walker (email
her) lives in Northern California and publishes
two websites,
LimitsToGrowth.org and
ImmigrationsHumanCost.org. She admires the ingenuity
of anyone who can live an Unbanked lifestyle in 2008!