|
September 25, 2003
More On The Mexodus: Parasite Nation
By Howard Sutherland
[hsutherland@lycos.com]
Just as mass immigration is making
the United States an
Alien Nation, so the extraordinary phenomenon of
government-encouraged
mass emigration from Mexico–what has been called the
“Mexodus” – is turning Mexico into a
Parasite Nation.
As
Allan Wall pointed out on
September 23, two reports recently released by the
Mexican government show just how entangled the U.S. and
Mexico are today.
The first, “Migration in Mexico and
the World,” from the National Population Council (Conapo)
revealed that over the last 40 years “registered”
emigration from Mexico exceeded 17 million –
overwhelmingly bound for the U.S. The second, from the
Bank of Mexico,
revealed that in the first half of 2003 – for the
first time – remittances of U.S. dollars to Mexico by
Mexicans in the United States exceeded inflows from
foreign investment and tourism.
I’d like to add two points to
Allan’s discussion:
 | Mexico’s population is now
approximately 100 million. The Conapo report
puts the number of Mexicans i.e. individuals born in
Mexico now living in the United States at 9.5 million.
Conapo estimates the number of American-born
children of Mexicans as 8.2 million. And it estimates
that there are 7.8 million second-generation
descendants of Mexicans in the United States. [
Llegaron a EU 17 millones de mexicanos By Sonia
Garcia, El Sol de Tijuana. August 29th,
2003] |
So Conapo is claiming that,
all told, there are more than 25.5 million Mexican
immigrants and their descendants in the U.S. – excluding
those derived from the pre-1963 presence.
In other words, one out every
five Mexicans in the world now lives in the U.S.
Not surprisingly, Conapo
finds that emigration to America now thoroughly
permeates Mexican life. Nearly one in every five Mexican
households (18% - 3.8 million) have “some kind of
migratory experience” with the U.S. and/or
receive remittances. Essentially all (96%) of the 2,350
Mexican municipalities (municipios) “have some
type of contact with the United States, either through
migration to that nation or returns from there, as well
as through money transfers from the United States.”
Well over a third of Mexican municipios (884 –
38%) are characterized by Conapo as having very
high, high or medium “migratory intensity.” Only
one municipio in 25 (93 - 4%) is characterized as
having no emigration.
 | The Bank of Mexico’s numbers
show that, in the first half of 2003, remittances
jumped by 29% to $6.3 billion. That suggests they
should be well over $12 billion for the year. Many of
those dollars would, of course, have been taxed away
if they had been earned legally in the U.S.
Remittances are certainly understated: the Bank of
Mexico counts dollars brought home by Mexicans
personally as “tourism” rather than what they almost
always are: the import of money gained up north. |
Even Conapo, which approves
of remittances, admits that “the great majority of
the money is spent on satisfying basic needs, the
purchase of durable consumer goods or home improvement”
rather than in areas that create Mexican jobs.
Vicente Fox has
lauded Mexicans in America as “heroes” who
keep both the U.S. and Mexican economies afloat. But
some Mexicans now
question whether the
wholesale translation of
Mexican towns and cities to the U.S. is good for
Mexico. (What it does to America is not their concern).
Roberto Madrazo, the leader of the
Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI),
the monolithic former ruling party,
calls the dependence on remittances a “clear
indication that we are on the threshold of a social
crisis.”
Madrazo is right. At this point,
American immigration reform may be all that can arrest
Mexico’s slide into complete parasitism.
Howard Sutherland
(email
him) is an attorney in New York. |