June 11, 2007
The Neoconservative Threat to American Freedom
By Paul Craig Roberts
The Bush/Cheney White House, which told the American
people in 2003 that the Iraqi invasion would be a three
to six week affair, now tells us that the US occupation
is permanent. Forever.
Attentive Americans of which, alas, there are so few,
had already concluded that the occupation was
permanent. Permanence is the obvious message from the
massive and fortified US embassy under construction in
Iraq and from the large permanent military bases that
the Bush regime is building in Iraq.
Bush regime propagandists have created a false analogy
with
"the Korean model" in their effort to sell the
permanent occupation of Iraq as necessary for Iraq’s
security. More than one half century after the close of
the Korean war, US troops continue to be based in Korea,
as they are in Germany more than six decades after the
end of World War II.
The rationale for the US troops in S. Korea is to remind
N. Korea that an attack on S. Korea is an attack on the
US itself. The rationale for US troops in Germany
disappeared when Reagan and Gorbachev brought the cold
war to an end.
There is, of course, no similarity between Iraq and
Korea. There was no insurgency in Korea and no attacks
on US troops based in S. Korea once the fighting
stopped. The presence of US troops in S. Korea has
produced many protest demonstrations by South Koreans,
but the US troops in S. Korea have had no exposure to
combat since the war ended in 1953.
In contrast, the insurgency in Iraq continues to rage
and could expand dramatically if Shi’ites were to join
the Sunnis in attacks on US forces. Most American
military leaders no longer believe the insurgency can be
defeated. Permanent occupation means permanent
insurgency. Indeed, an attempt at permanent occupation
could possibly unify the Arabs in a joint effort to
expel the Americans.
The absurd analogy with Korea is so far-fetched that it
raises the question whether the Bush/Cheney regime has
entered a new, higher level of delusion. Bush cannot
keep troops in Iraq permanently unless he intends to
remain permanently in the White House. Even some
Republicans in Congress are talking about beginning
withdrawals of US troops in September. Republicans
believe that if withdrawals do not begin, their party
will be wiped out in the 2008 election.
The wild card is the
neoconservatives and their long-standing alliance
with Israeli Zionists. The neoconservatives still have
a death grip on the discredited Bush regime.
Jim Lobe describes the extensive international
organization that the neoconservatives have put into
place for the purpose of orchestrating an attack on
Iran.
A sane reader might wonder why neoconservatives would
want to expand a conflict in which the US has failed.
Surely, even delusional "cakewalk"
neoconservatives must realize that attacking Iran would
greatly increase the threat to US troops in Iraq and
perhaps bring missile attacks on oil facilities and US
bases throughout the Middle East. An attack on Iran
would further radicalize Muslims and further undermine
US puppets in the Middle East. It could bring war to
the entire region.
The point is that the neoconservatives do realize this.
Their defeat in Iraq and Israel’s defeat in Lebanon has
taught the neoconservatives that the US cannot prevail
in the Middle East by conventional military means. As I
have previously explained, the neoconservatives’ plan is
to escape the failure of their Iraq plan by
orchestrating a war with Iran in which the US can
prevail only by using nuclear weapons. As
previously reported, the neoconservatives believe that
the use of nuclear weapons against Iran will convince
Muslims that they must accept US hegemony.
The neoconservatives have put the elements of their plan
in place. They have powerful naval forces on station off
Iran’s coast. They have convinced President Bush that
only by attacking Iran can he prevail in Iraq.
The neoconservatives have
rewritten US war doctrine to permit preemptive US
nuclear attack on non-nuclear countries. They have
demonized Iran as the greatest threat since Hitler.
Neoconservatives have invented "Islamofascism,"
something that exists only in the neoconservative
propaganda used to instill in Americans hatred of
Muslims. The neoconservatives have dehumanized Muslims
as monsters who must be destroyed at all costs. Recent
statements by neoconservative leaders such as Norman
Podhoretz read like the ravings of ignorant lunatics.
Podhoretz has written Muslims out of the human race. He
demands that their culture be deracinated.
Neoconservatives, convinced that a nuclear attack will
bring Muslims to heel, are ignoring the likely blowback
and unintended consequences of an attack on Iran, just
as they ignored the likely consequences of their attack
on Iraq. If the neoconservatives are mistaken in their
assumption that nuclear weapons will cause Muslims to
submit to the US, the consequences will be
unmanageable.
The neoconservative Bush regime has got away with more
than I thought possible, perhaps because most of
Congress and the American public cannot imagine the
degree of insanity that lies behind the Bush
administration. Most Americans who have turned against
the regime think that the administration is incompetent,
that it jumped to wrong conclusions about Iraq, and that
it mismanaged the war and will not admit its mistakes.
As every reason Bush gave for the war has proven to be
false, people see no point in continuing the struggle.
If Americans understood the enormity of the deception
behind the invasion of Iraq (and Afghanistan) and the
pending attack on Iran, Bush and Cheney would be
impeached and turned over to the War Crimes Tribunal at
the Hague, and AIPAC would be forced to register as a
foreign agent.
Just as Goebbels said, some lies are too big to be
disbelieved. It is this disbelief that is so
dangerous. The inability of Americans to see through
the Big Lie to the secret agenda allows the
neoconservatives to escape accountability and to
continue with their plot.
The neoconservatives also believe that nuclear attack on
Iran will isolate America in the world and, thereby,
give the government control over the American people.
The denunciations that will be hurled at Americans from
every quarter will force the country to wrap itself in
the flag and to treat domestic critics as foreign
enemies. Not only free speech but also truth itself
will disappear along with every civil liberty.
COPYRIGHT
CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
Paul Craig Roberts
[email
him] was Assistant
Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration.
He is the author of
Supply-Side Revolution : An Insider's Account of
Policymaking in Washington;
Alienation
and the Soviet Economy and
Meltdown: Inside the Soviet Economy,
and is the co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton of
The Tyranny of Good Intentions : How Prosecutors and
Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name
of Justice. Click
here for Peter
Brimelow’s Forbes Magazine interview with Roberts
about the recent epidemic of prosecutorial misconduct.