An Immigrant Argues In Favor Of Shutting The Door To
America
By
Philip Bennett
Boston Globe,
May
12, 1995
BOOK REVIEW
ALIEN NATION
Common Sense About America's Immigration Disaster
By
Peter Brimelow
Random House, 327 pp., illustrated, $24
Immigration may be as close as America gets to a
creation myth. But Peter Brimelow sees in the record
numbers of recent immigrants the seeds of the country's
destruction. Making a case for a temporary ban on all
immigration, and eventual permanent reductions, he
argues that foreign newcomers threaten a "war on the
nation-state," leading possibly to "the snuffing
out of the American nation—like a candle in a gale."
"Alien
Nation: Common Sense About America's Immigration
Disaster"
is a provocative outline of the thinking behind the
growing movement to restrict immigration. Expanding a
1992 article in National Review, Brimelow, an
editor of Forbes magazine and an
immigrant from
England, develops many of the arguments that
persuaded a majority of California voters last fall to
endorse Proposition 187, denying illegal immigrants
public education and other social services.
That vote was a preview of what now seems inevitable
change in US immigration law. Hardening attitudes toward
immigrants may also explain the generally bland critical
acceptance of Brimelow's assertion that immigration is
dangerous chiefly for undermining "a plain historical
fact: that the American nation has always had a specific
ethnic core. And that core has been white." Today,
by contrast, he reports, "when you enter the INS
waiting rooms you find yourself in an underworld that is
not just teeming but is also almost entirely colored."
Brimelow takes a torch to many comfortable assumptions
about immigration, including its economic impact
(largely negative, he says) and the perception of it as
a continuous feature of American history (it has been an
intermittent, and traditionally contested, phenomenon).
Today about 1 million legal immigrants settle in the
country each year, and 300,000 to 500,000 illegally.
Brimelow blames ill-considered consequences of the 1965
Immigration Act for the arrival of more than 16.7
million immigrants in the last 30 years. The American
"lifeboat" is full, he says. It is time to raise the
ladder.
It's not the numbers alone that Brimelow finds ominous,
but that 80 percent of these immigrants are from Asia
and Latin America. "There is no precedent for a
sovereign country undergoing such a rapid and radical
transformation of its ethnic character in the entire
history of the world," he concludes.
For a book that aims to be meticulously alarming, this
seems like a careless premise. After all, the percentage
of America's foreign-born population was higher in 1910
than today (about 9 percent). But Brimelow performs a
neat trick. He writes that earlier immigrants—Germans,
Irish and Italians—were already "closely related"
by "a common ethnic heritage." This was untrue
then; it is untrue now. These immigrants seemed at least
as foreign to native-born Americans as a family from
Zacatecas, Mexico, today. The difference, of course, is
that they were white.
Whether being white is a prerequisite for becoming
American is an issue Brimelow does not fully explore.
Instead, he cites projections that by 2050, post-1970
immigration will account for 36 percent of the
population, a bloc that will act with other nonwhites as
"pincers" to strangle the national identity.
One of the things wrong with such predictions is that
immigration does not end at the border. How and to what
extent new arrivals reconcile the past and future—how
they assimilate—is a crucial question of our time, as
important as abuses or shortcomings of policy. The
country almost certainly changes immigrants more than
they change the country. But Brimelow devotes only a few
pages to this transaction.
Immigrants, tellingly, are almost entirely absent from
the book. In what appears an afterthought, the author
ventures for part of an evening to the border, where he
watches ghostly figures move across an INS infrared
screen. The immigrant is our new Invisible Man:
anonymous and everywhere, lurking behind every problem
and, it seems, every candidate for higher office. Just
as immigration can be an empty vessel for idealized
hopes, Brimelow finds its shadow on every woe: crime,
disease, welfare, even abortion (which among whites, he
speculates, is sometimes due to economic insecurity
caused by immigrants).
Brimelow's own talents for assimilation include mastery
of the breezy demagoguery so fashionable in American
political speech. Immigration advocates, liberal
"alienists" but also The Wall Street Journal
are "traitorous." John Tanton, the founder of the
Federation of American Immigration Reform, is lauded as
"truly a citizen who has taken up arms for his
country." The
aftermath of the
Oklahoma City bombing has made a few passages in
"Alien
Nation" creepy: "Deep into the
twenty-first century, throughout the lifetime of my
little son, American patriots will be fighting to
salvage as much as possible from the shipwreck of their
great republic."
In
the coming debate, the reasoning that finds expression
in such language may have the kind of unintended,
ominous effects that Brimelow sees in current law.
Seeking to exclude future immigrants, he finds a threat
in millions of new Americans. He risks promoting the
division that he warns against.