December 23, 2008
WAR AGAINST CHRISTMAS COMPETITION 2008:
[blog]
[I] [II] [III]
[IV]
[V]
[VI]
[VII][VIII][IX][X][XI][XII][XIII]- See also: War Against Christmas
2007,
2006,
2005,
2004,
2003,
2002,
2001,
2000,
1999
Report all attempts to abolish Christmas to
christmas@vdare.com.
A copy of Steve Sailer's
AMERICA’S HALF-BLOOD PRINCE to
the most outrageous!
War Against Christmas 2008: A Christmas Eve Report
I took a look around Google News and the Blogosphere
today—courtesy search engines—to see what is going on in
the War On/Against Christmas. (The
National Review competition invented by
Peter
Brimelow in the mid 90s was
“Against”,
but “On” is clearly the more popular formulation.)
A huge change has occurred compared to earlier this
decade.
First of all, actual atrocities are harder to find, and
many of those about are foreign.
Unfortunately, as I
noted the other day, that is partly because news is
about change. Enemies of Christmas conquered huge
swathes of territory in years gone by: their holding on
is hardly news.
And it is clear that that is how the MSM likes it. Most
A very clear example is
National Review
itself, now of course just the MSM’s Potemkin Village
for conservative-minded
naifs. Having neglected its own (in an institutional
sense) issue for several years, it
explicitly renounced it two years ago. Now the word,
let alone the subject, is hardly to be found on the
NR website.
Mark Steyn does break ranks once with a
slighting quip, no doubt reflecting the control
faction’s true feelings.
On the other hand, no doubt
reflecting a perception of their target market’s actual
preferences, the ostentatious use of
“
More widely, as the Catholic League’s Bill Donohue has
noted, he latest gambit by the anti-Christmas Czars
is to flood public parks with a vast array of cultural
symbols. For example, at the
And this is reflected in a number of op-eds and
prominent Letters to the Editor too.
The ludicrous tactic of War Against Christmas Denial,
explicitly renounced by the
Los Angeles Times
two years ago and utterly refuted by the
However, a fine example from
It starts with the familiar aggressively contemptuous
name-calling:
“In Australia you can find a parent to complain when the
preschool nativity play is ditched in a favour of a
musical extolling peace on earth. The tabloid media can
always foment mock outrage over a card that says ‘Happy
Holidays’ instead of ‘Merry Christmas’. Someone can be
found to whinge when the Christmas carols at the
end-of-year concert are of the Jingle Bells genre
rather than the Away In A Manger ilk.
“And a bigot somewhere will use Christmas to try to
ignite resentment against immigrants for their failure
to appreciate that ‘Australia is a Christian country’.
“From the other side, some zealous atheist, Muslim, Jew
or civil libertarian may be goaded into denouncing the
encroachment of Christmas into a child-care centre or
school.”
(Any War Against Christmas veteran will immediately see
that although adjective-strewn, the facts are conceded.)
But Horin eventually discloses her motive:
“As a Jew in a state school, I dreaded the first
First Noel and the first Away In A Manger,
for they heralded, not for me the angels singing, but a
season of confusion and alienation. Australia then was a
less multicultural and more Christian nation, less
tolerant of difference. It was an era of veiled
anti-Semitism when Christians blamed Jews for the death
of Christ, and Jews, at least where I grew up, barely
acknowledged that Christ had existed.
“Teachers showed no glimmer of sensitivity to the
sensibilities of those not in the club. The class
nativity play was compulsory, we sang the holy songs,
and festooned the room with drawings of the manger, and
a baby Jesus I was not supposed to believe in.
“Well into adulthood, Christmas re-awakened in me
feelings of discomfort, of being an outsider in my own
land. But the more diverse and secular Australia became,
the more I have learnt to like Christmas…
“More and more ‘outsiders’ seem happy to turn Christmas
to their own pleasurable purposes so that the day has
become a national holiday - and unlike Australia Day or
Anzac Day—it's a day for the extended family.”
Of course, Christmas has always been a day for the
“extended family”.
But historic Australia had to be destroyed before Adele
Horin could bring herself to tolerate the festival. (email
Horin)
On a pleasanter note, the American media is finding some
room for measured and intelligent discussions of the
issue. For instance
YOUR VIEW: A battle in the war against religion, by Kevin Cardin
SouthCoastToday, December 19 2008
is a good statement of anti War
Against Christmas case.
I miss "Merry Christmas," but not for the reasons you
think by Kathleen O’Brien NJ.com
And
from
Subjectively, The War Against Christmas offensive has
clearly been blunted. This is probably the biggest
(perhaps only?) conservative achievement in the Culture
War for many years.
The
price: eternal vigilance. And
support for those willing to defy the PC Commissars
and their fashion-fearing fellow-travelers. |