December 19, 2004
WAR
AGAINST CHRISTMAS 2004 COMPETITION
[I]
[II]
[III]
[IV]
[V]
[VI]
[VII]
[VIII]
[IX]
[X]
[XI]
[XII]
[XIV]
[XV]
[XVI]
[XVII]
[XVIII]
[XIX]
[XX]
- See also: War
Against Christmas
2003,
2002,
2001,
2000
War Against Christmas 2004 Competition [XIII]:
Now The New York Times!
All This Establishment Attention Is Worrying! [A Reader]
After Charles Krauthammer’s recent generous and
gracious
column objecting to suppression of Christmas, comes
an equally amazing event—a major New York Times
article (Does
Christmas Need To Be Saved, by Kate Zernike,
December 19, 2004) discussing the matter in a reasonably
even-handed and even sympathetic way:
“…demands to bring back
Christmas are not simply part of an age-old culture war,
with the A.C.L.U. in one corner and evangelicals in the
other. There is also a more moderate force, asking
whether the country has gone too far… Why, they ask,
must a Christmas tree become a holiday tree?... even
many liberals say there is silliness in the way schools
in particular try to avoid offending anyone…”
It even names a
website devoted to defending Christmas—no, not
VDARE.com!
All this marks a huge change from 2000 when VDARE.COM
launched its first competition. One can see why the
anti-Christmas forces are becoming so
angry.
And yet…is this too easy? Is it possible your 2001
correspondent was right in suspecting such signs as
the NRO retreat from its virtually complete
suppression of Christmas the previous year, like the
revival of religious symbols in WW2
Soviet Union, had to do with sustaining a military
effort?
[PermaLink] [Top]