|
December 12, 2003
Dogging
A Democrat On Immigration
By
Joe Guzzardi
Why are all nine 2004 Democratic
presidential candidates (whom I won’t dignify by
naming—and I’m a
Democrat!) in lockstep on America’s mass immigration
disaster?
That’s the mystery. Straight down
the line, the Democrats are
more than happy to give away the store: amnesty,
guest worker programs, in-state university tuition
rates etc ad nauseum.
With all the candidates so far to
the left, surely one of them could quietly move a few
inches toward the center—thereby getting more in tandem
with mainstream America?
If you want answers, you’ve got to
ask questions. So I decided to put it to one of the nine:
“Why do
you take your open borders stance in defiance of
American wishes?”
And I chose as my target the most
obvious traitor, Senator John Edwards (1977 honors
graduate from the University of North Carolina law
school) from the immigration-beleaguered North Carolina.
Edwards’ immigration policies are
from some
distant planet.
I thoughtfully prepared my complete
question:
“Given
that
1] North Carolina has experienced a nearly 300%
increase in immigration since 1990 and that the state’s
total immigrant population—mostly from Mexico—is about
500,000; and given further that
2] North Carolina’s unemployment rate is among the
nation’s highest at 6.1%; and finally given that
3] North Carolina is second only to Georgia in percent
of urban land developed over the last fifteen years’
immigration-driven growth,
—would you consider modifying your pro-illegal
immigration stance to reflect a more realistic approach
that matches public opinion?”
With reporter’s notebook in hand, I
dialed John Edwards’ Raleigh campaign headquarters in
Raleigh, NC. My call was given to Jeremy Vaness.
Identifying myself as a journalist and concerned
American, I took a deep breath and rattled off my
question.
Vaness couldn’t duck fast enough. He
said: “I can’t comment on that. I’ll pass your inquiry
onto our new National Spokesman, Roger Salazar.”
Roger Salazar?! This was akin to
saying the message would be given to Vicente Fox. A
former
Clinton appointee and previously a staffer with
the Gore 2000 campaign, Salazar’s most recent political
job was 2002 press secretary to the
infamous and now
disgraced Gray Davis.
Pickings must be slim for National
Spokesmen if you have to choose someone who worked for
the Davis train wreck.
Since—no surprise—Salazar didn’t
return my inquiry within a few days, I fearlessly
reloaded and called again.
This time, armed with additional
fodder, I was prepared to ask a more probing version of
my first question.
To my original query, I added:
“Given
that a recent Raleigh News and Observer poll
indicated that 74% of North Carolinians think the US
admits too many legal immigrants and 73% think that
illegal Mexican workers who otherwise abide by the law
should be deported, wouldn’t your prospects for
re-election in your home state—should your presidential
bid fail—be greater if your immigration policy were more
consistent with the thinking of your constituents?” [Welcome
mat not out for state's immigrants, poll shows, By
Michael Easterbrook,
November
24, 2003, (Full
Poll Results)]
This time, it was media
representative Carlos Mojet who deferred.
Of course, it was disappointing to
get no reaction whatsoever. My faith in the political
process would have been restored—at least a tad—if
Salazar had called back to say something like
“Look, Edwards doesn’t care about whether his stance on
amnesty helps or hurts his presidential prospects. He
feels passionately that illegal aliens are entitled to
amnesty.”
For what has happened in
North Carolina—abetted by John Edwards and Governor
Michael Easley–is a disgrace.
Years ago, when I saw the
handwriting on California’s wall, I considered North
Carolina a potential haven. How wrong I was.
Randy Lewis, a former Californian
who did actually move to North Carolina, is now the
Director of
Stop the Invasion, a North Carolina-based
immigration reform organization had this to say about
the Tar Heel State and John Edwards.
“North
Carolina is California East. In the five years that I
have been here, I have seen many changes. North Carolina
has THE fast growing population of "Hispanics,"
a euphemism for
illegal aliens, of ANY state in the U.S.
Republicans and Democrats are doing their best to
offer every incentive ($$$) to illegal aliens.
“Edwards
may be a North Carolina native son but he is also a
Hispandering traitor. Since elected to the Senate,
Edwards has been AWOL for almost half the roll calls. He
has been to Iowa so often; it might jeopardize his North
Carolina residency requirement. He really wants to be
president.
“During
the last five years, North Carolina has gone directly
downhill. NAFTA has
devastated the state. Illegal aliens spread
drugs,
crime and
disease. Because of illegal aliens, wages are down
but taxes, to pay for the services aliens use, are up.
“What is
the solution offered by politicians like John Edwards? We
need more aliens!”
I may have been foiled in my primary
goal of getting a direct answer to a straight question.
But I learned something very worthwhile: the campaign
staffs are extremely uncomfortable talking about
immigration. They never get tough questions so they have
no idea how to handle them.
The campaigns are coming soon to
hustings near you. Get your tough questions ready.
Joe Guzzardi [email
him], an instructor in English at the Lodi
Adult School, has been writing a weekly newspaper column
since 1988. This column is exclusive to VDARE.COM. |