|
June 29, 2006
Pence Ploy Part II: Security, Smugglers And
Scapegoats
By Bryanna Bevens
[See also:
Hey Mike Pence! Amnesty Is The Absence Of Punishment—Not
The Presence of Reward!]
So it looks like
House Republicans have more or less decided to can
that appalling
Senate bill.
Instead, they have
decided to hold
public hearings throughout the summer in an attempt
to gauge the public’s opinion before drafting an
immigration bill.
Arlen Specter, the
supposed Republican Senator from
Pennsylvania who loves the Senate amnesty
bill is not happy with that decision…so he’s holding his
own public hearings.
Specter wants to talk
with
farmers,
construction companies and the
service industry.
You know, the people
who benefit from illegal immigration and cheap labor
guest worker programs.
House Republicans are
focusing on
everyday people in the states most affected by
illegal immigration.
You know, the people
footing the bill.
Meanwhile –
particularly in the wake of Chris Cannon's pyrrhic but
propaganda-providing primary victory in Utah - the Pence
Ploy is still being sold as a "compromise" bill.
It's even gained
support from a few high-profile conservatives. In his
recent column,
Immigration Impasse:
Unlikely Legislation in this Congress [June 20,
2006] Paul Weyrich says 'the Pence bill deserves
serious consideration' and 'it is one great start to try to find a solution to the immigration
mess even if it has to await consideration until the
next Congress.'
Bunk! As I showed in
my
last column, the Pence Plan is
worse than the Senate bill - which is saying
something!
Yeah…and we only
covered the behemoth guest worker program Pence wants to
create.
There is much, much
more wrong with it.
1. The border security portion focuses on reports
and surveys instead of well,
securing the border.
2. Pence would scapegoat the smugglers—the
penalty for smuggling goes way up but the penalty
for illegal immigrants stays the same: nothing.
3. Lame employer penalties
4. Useless voluntary departure programs
Title I of the Pence
Plan is called Securing
U.S. Borders.
It sounds like a good
first step but it consists almost entirely of reports,
studies, data collection, reviews, recommendations,
consultations and tracking.
There did not appear
to be a lot of action if you know what I mean:
 | Sec. 113
establishes a Border Patrol Unit for the U.S. Virgin
Islands and; |
 | Sec. 115 requires
the DHS to submit a report to Congress of (a) how
many illegal immigrants were admitted to the United
States for
emergency medical care and (b) how many were
removed after medical care was administered. |
(That last one is
again, just a report. The information gathered is very
valuable but only if somebody does something to fix
the problem.)
Title II of the Pence
Plan is called: Combating
Alien Smuggling And Illegal
Entry And Presence
This section does
establish criminal penalties for persons who aid illegal
immigration. But it only addresses
the smugglers. The penalty for alien smuggling would
increase to a range of 3 to 20 years in prison and of
course, fines.
Ok, what about the
other people and/or agencies who aid and abet illegal
immigration?
Religious entities are
exempt. So are those who provide
'short-term,
in-kind, non-cash emergency humanitarian assistance,
including medical care, housing, counseling, victim
services, and food, or to transport the alien to a
location where such assistance can be rendered.'
[Title II Sec.
274 (3) (B)]
Look, these alien
smugglers or
coyotes
are definitely
scumbags who need to be beaten into submission. And
the Pence Plan does go after them—but it also makes them
scapegoats.
Why are illegal
immigrants not subjected to the same punishment as those
they hire to help carry out the crime?
In America, a man may
hire another man to kill his wife but he is still
guilty of murder even though he didn’t technically pull
the trigger—it’s called
conspiracy.
As I described in my
last column, the Pence Plan claims to deter illegal
immigration primarily by punishing those who hire them.
These are Pence's
employer restrictions:
'Any person who,
during any 12-month period,
knowingly hires for employment at least 10
individuals with actual knowledge that the individuals
are aliens shall be fined under title 18, United 21
States Code, imprisoned for not more than 5 years or
both.'
[Sec. 274 (b) (1)]
In other words, this
means an employer can hire nine illegal immigrants
per year without consequence.
I'm going to guess
that's a good share of illegal alien employment.
Not that it matters!
Construction and
agriculture are the primary industries that hire
illegal aliens. Most of these companies hire their
employees through a
labor contractor.
Labor contractors (usually illegal aliens
themselves) have an arrangement with the employer to
provide X number of workers for what is more or less a
finder’s fee.
This is a binding
contract in which the contractor agrees to provide the
employer with legal workers only—not illegal immigrants.
The guilty party has
always been the contractor, not the farmer or the
construction company. You've heard of laundering money.
The contractors are laundering labor.
The Pence Plan does
not address this loophole.
Once again, it sounds
good but in truth accomplishes nothing.
Now onto one of my
favorite parts: Voluntary Departure
it’s HUGE and
hugely flawed.
The idea:
 | If illegal aliens
agree to depart the country before legal
proceedings begin, they have up to 120 days to
leave. |
 | The judge may
require them to post a bond but is under no
obligation to do so—the illegal aliens simply
state their intention to leave. We take them at
their word. After all, they've never broken the law
before, right? |
 | If illegal aliens
agree to leave after the proceedings have
already started, they have only 60 days to comply.
Additionally, they have to post a bond that can only
be redeemed after they leave the country. |
Wait a minute, no
they don’t.
'An
immigration judge may waive posting of a voluntary
departure bond in individual cases upon a finding that
the alien has presented compelling evidence that the
posting of a bond will be a serious financial hardship
and the alien has presented credible evidence that such
a bond is unnecessary to guarantee timely departure.'
Presumably
Congressman Pence wanted to provide an incentive
for illegal aliens to leave of their own accord in lieu
of a costly court proceeding.
But when will he (and
the rest of his colleagues) learn that the coax and
coddle approach does not work?
Illegal immigrants
should not receive incentives to follow our laws—they
should simply fear the consequences when they do not.
 | If an illegal
immigrant chooses voluntary departure, the agreement
shall include a waiver to the right of any
further motion. This includes appeal,
application, and petition relating to removal. |
But the Pence
language goes on to say:
'However, if an
alien agrees to voluntary departure but later files a
timely appeal of the immigration judge’s decision
granting voluntary departure, the alien may pursue the
appeal instead of the voluntary departure
agreement.'
So they can
appeal?
Now it’s time to ask
the question I always ask…what happens if they
do not honor the agreement and leave the country?
Answer:
 | The alien will be
liable for a
civil penalty of $3,000 unless otherwise
specified in the removal order…which can be anything
or nothing. |
 | The alien is
ineligible for any benefits under this
section…unless he pays the civil penalty first…then
he can start over. |
So to summarize the
Pence Ploy:
There is not a reform
bill.
In fact, it will only
make matters worse by increasing the number of
unskilled immigrants in America.
This bill does not
punish illegal immigrants at all.
Within the American
justice system, an adequate punishment has been
determined to include elements of both consequence and
deterrence.
Effective law
enforcement cannot be achieved without it.
The most effective
way to accomplish this is to not allow criminals to
benefit from their crime.
Bryanna's bottom
line: Fines, penalties, maybe a few days in county jail
or a week-long trip back to Mexico to get a guaranteed
visa will not work—ever.
It’s like sentencing
a
bank robber to a couple months in jail but letting
him
keep the money.
It’s like sentencing
a
car thief to a couple months in jail but letting him
keep the car.
It’s like…oh, you get
the point!
We will never stop
illegal immigration until we start denying these people
that which they broke the law to obtain:
Residency in the
United States.
Bryanna Bevens [email
her] is a political consultant and former chief of staff
for a member of the California State Assembly. |